- 22 Sep 2018 17:45
#14948217
You are getting a little sloppy in your old age my friend.
I apologize for my Drlee comment. That was a cheap shot. I prefer to think that my juxtaposition gambit was a graphic illustration of the inherent absurdity of calling a corporation a person. Devil's advocacy as opposed to trolling. The whole corporation as person gambit is quite obviously a play to advance plutocracy/money while fucking the little guy behind a wall of lawyer hogwash. Rather than accuse you of false equivalencies I will grant you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you failed to grasp my point which had nothing at all to do with contracts.
blackjack21 wrote:You do realize that the proponents of the 3/5ths Compromise were abolitionists, right? They weren't saying blacks are 3/5ths of a human.
jimjam wrote: for purposes of representation in Congress,
You are getting a little sloppy in your old age my friend.
blackjack21 wrote:You placed a picture of GM headquarters in juxtaposition to a picture of a small girl. I believe Drlee calls that "trolling" when I do it. Comparing a small girl's capacity to contract relative to that of General Motors is a valid legal comparison. In actual fact, the little girl does not have a capacity to contract, whereas General Motors does have such capacity.
I apologize for my Drlee comment. That was a cheap shot. I prefer to think that my juxtaposition gambit was a graphic illustration of the inherent absurdity of calling a corporation a person. Devil's advocacy as opposed to trolling. The whole corporation as person gambit is quite obviously a play to advance plutocracy/money while fucking the little guy behind a wall of lawyer hogwash. Rather than accuse you of false equivalencies I will grant you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you failed to grasp my point which had nothing at all to do with contracts.
"Society in those days was a perfectly competent, perfectly complacent, ruthless machine." Virginia Woolf 1897