- 18 Oct 2018 06:23
#14954577
Which established facts show that the inquiry was fake?
————————————
Let us start again: the OP does not show a correlation between increased temperatures and biodiversity because there is no correlation.
It merely mentions that previous warm eras had more biodiversity. This is not correlation.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Sivad wrote:It has nothing to do with trust, the established facts in that report are enough to call bullshit on the entire charade. It was a fake inquiry conducted by establishment apparatchiks and we all knew the conclusions it would reach before it ever got underway. Before it even started I would have bet my house and my pension that they wouldn't find any significant wrongdoing. The whole thing's a fucking joke.
Which established facts show that the inquiry was fake?
————————————
Victoribus Spolia wrote:What refutations? I saw only concessions and double-speak.
Please note that you failed to provide evidence for relevant arguments that actually addressed my claims.
Let us start again: the OP does not show a correlation between increased temperatures and biodiversity because there is no correlation.
It merely mentions that previous warm eras had more biodiversity. This is not correlation.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...