- 07 Jan 2019 19:50
#14978199
I don't accept your explanation Blackjack. I think you are justifying your own privileges and don't really care about equality because in your paradigm of nationalism you see yourself and your individual interests as primordial and your ethnic group and class category as primordial. In other words, you don't want to know, or even contemplate any equality. It doesn't serve your interests. Period. I won't make excuses for you Blackjack. You are a class conscious snob person, with a need to not have his taxes confiscated by a 'left leaning' state apparatus. Period. Empirical knowledge if it contradicts your own class conscious self interest? Will be roundly rejected by you. Very few or none of your class Blackjack21 commit (suicidio de clase) or class suicide. Yep, you fall into that category quite neatly. It also answers why the Brahmin doctor friend of yours does the same. Class identification. It bolsters my argument of class being linked to almost all forms of discrimination of the lower classes, and it also solidifies a power based relationship. Nothing new there for me to do.
Lol. Sure, you are Blackjack. Didn't you try putting me down with moron and idiot? Lol. Verbal abuse. But since I don't give a damn about that part of oppression? No me importa. If all the successful women in my family had listened to that bullshit from a bunch of class conscious discriminators over the years? And it kept them from accomplishing things? Life would be truly full of stupidity now wouldn't it? You also judge people by how much money they make, or if their nation is financially solvent or not. The USA's deficit is pretty high. A lot of bankruptcies in the USA. Interesting I ran across a youtube video of the ten 'most' intelligent people in the world. A few had some low brow, fairly low paid work. Money did not motivate them. Hmmm? Different value system maybe?
Should I make sweeping statements about how 'valuable' the entire country is due to this problem? (financial insolvency).Lol. I put the blame where it goes--who is causing the financial issues? Identify them and hold them accountable. Usually it is some globalist multinational international capitalist class elites. Bankers. Elites and their powerful apparatuses. I don't equate ordinary working people, middle class people as the respresentative of why a nation fails financially. Not if it is under some form of capitalism Blackjack. Most nations are.
Blackjack, there is a lot of things going on in many nations. Some of them good, and some of them bad. One has to choose what kinds of problems one chooses to deal with. The solution is not for all the non-Americans to be wanting to pull up stakes and move to the USA. The solution for most nations is to create enough stability economically, socially and politically to be able to have people prefer to stay put in their native nations and avoid the hassle, problems and instability and risk that goes hand-in-hand with immigrating to another country. Thinking your own nation is living in isolation from the claws of neoliberalism, and its need to be incesting itself, with other countries to perpetuate the same economic system, but in a much less developed form, that leads to a consistently worse economic shape than the first world countries are in, is the epitome of short-sightedness. That is why I think your brand of nationalism is short-sighted, and not intelligent in the long run. The structure is going to break you in half always. Got to work with what is here and developed. You can't revert to past shit (your brand of nationalism),that no longer works, or was shown by history, to run into such horrific problems, that they wind up losing to liberal forms of power.
It is broke. Which makes it a dangerous place to be pushing sexism, racism,and colonialism, and to squeeze unrealistic forms of repayment Blackjack. You can't charge people money they can't repay, the plan is buying a land base for fire sale pricing. Puerto Rico is not the only one to be targeted by those vulture banksters. It makes the island a powder keg of violence, and rebellion in the near future, if it continues on the road it is currently on. I am pro independence on that issue. I think Puerto Rico is another culture, has another history, and never was meant to coalesce into, and integrate itself, with the USA. The Puerto Ricans voted against becoming USA citizens in 1917, before and during the Jones Act Blackjack. You read the insular cases and found them very bizarre. I remember reading your opinion on that. So? Bizarre shit, and weird colonial relationships, with your kind of Virgin Island, Libertarian style no-taxation haven. That is what Puerto Rico faces now. Crypto currency moguls (Puerto cryptos),descending on the island wanting to buy up cheap land and be free of taxes from Uncle Sam. Create the island in their own plan and image. They had a meeting with a bunch of Puerto Ricans. Do you want me to post the video? How that went over? It is not pretty. The privileged like you? Men with money that they want to be free from the claws of liberal taxation needs to move to some islands in the Caribbean. They don't give a shit about some Puerto Ricans that lived there for 500 years and more and who speak Spanish, and are not interested in moving to a USA state. They want to remake the island as if there was no one there for five plus centuries. If they continue with that bullshit? I predict they will get some problems with the locals. For sure. Why is there trouble in paradise Mr. Jones aka Blackjack? The inferiors? No. The greedy. Lol.
You think this is going to work in the long run for the best for the USA? For the Caribbean region? For the world? I don't think it is. You are going to have angry people over time. Or people moving into the USA. To your neck of the woods. Spanish speakers and with college degrees and without them moving there to find work. More pressure. More Latinos moving in. Why? The bad decisions by the greedy. And the 'multicultural'. Who don't care about lily whitness and white race dominance either. Nationalism. Dead again with this stuff.
You might love it for your financial portfolio @blackjack21. A man who hates paying taxes. But you got to go and physically live there (6 months out of the year). Among the Puerto Ricans, or you may pay to live in gated communities, far from the rabble that broke into your place and left your China behind. Rabble American and islanders. Not quite isolated well enough. I will tell you this? The cops have left by the tens of thousands. From 27,000 cops to 7,000 cops left and they say crime is going up due to that. Why? The banks want to be paid first before teachers, clinics, road repair, water pipes repair, sewage updates, government employees, pensions for public sector employees and retirement, cop, fire fighters etc. So? The local Puerto Rican cops LEFT. To get a higher paying job in the mainland. Make more money, and get some real benefits and pay. With running water that is predictable, and electricity not mired in FEMA rules of backward grid types, and corrupt deals from local and federal government contractors. Also get decent public school funding. They left. You move there to protect your money? You might get some problems with the locals. The non criminal and the criminal. But if tax havens are all you care about? Give it a shot?
And if some American tax dodgers get shot by some radical Puerto Ricans pissed off at bad economic conditions while the class conscious think their stuff is untouchable? and make the news? They need to analyze what exactly did they do to shake up such hatred? Think about that. You can brag about saving some taxes as some crazy Boricuas shot you in the ass out of what? Snobbery? Lol. I think Naomi Klein covered it in her little book, "Battle for Paradise: Disaster Capitalism". I like Anthony Bourdain's take on it Blackjack. I will put in his short take on the situation on the island. Eh? Women running the show has nothing to do with failure. It is the power relationship and banks. Something the USA may have issues with too. You nationalists will have a mighty battle with those people as well trying to not destroy your imagined meritocracy and every class in its proper genetically determined slot place, una mierda as a thought as well.
Latinos. Lol. I don't know. All roads lead to Rome for many people. You made me smile with this one. I am smiling. No jodas hombre!
How many times do I hate to repeat to you something Blackjack21? Eh? Sin verguenza (shameless man)? Human beings shape their society according to many factors culturally and economically. I am old fashioned with my research methods in cultural anthropology. You go out there do your 'thick description' and ethnographic studies and cultural studies and historical and empirical research. What are similar human traits? Why do they differ? What are the underpinning causations behind it? Power relationships? Do they change over time and why? Is there a pattern? It gets interesting. One of the most prolific and best selling authors of feminist literature is Japanese. Did I know this? No. Had to do research. It turns out feminist graphic novels and lit for reading on a bus, train or subway in Tokyo is about feminist perspectives. Spain as well. The shit one digs up about culture is almost endless Blackjack. No use making sweeping statements outside of cultural contexts. Culture is one of those great mysteries still in this world. My father was a linguist. His obsession were origins of words and dictionaries and tracing the origin of language families. No matter how hard the linguists tried? Could not get a hold of the first spoken human language and who spoke it first and why a grammar emerged. Too complex. Languages are living things. So are cultures. They emerge, die off, and another takes it place. Then you got places like Israel that revive dead languages to create an 'ethno/religious/cultural' state. It is fascinating really.
I can't think that way Blackjack. I see my relationship to many others and other cultures, languages and nations and class of peoples? As all interlinked. I see things like nature does. She doesn't create boundaries and borders. She deals with topographies and tectonic plates, metamorphic rock, versus magma or shale, etc everything in an interdependent system relying on the existence of each other in a very cyclical and cause and effect style of natural manifestation. One part of the system is dysfunctional? It has to correct it somehow to gain balance. Humans are not separate from that system. I frankly care if we can't get our shit together in time to avoid disaster. If we don't care about large groups of people losing out on being able to stay stable? You will get mass immigration, resource scarcity, pollution and scientific disaster....in the making. I have a little boy of 7 years. I don't give a shit about my future anymore. I am old. Fifty three I turned three days ago. I may have 20 more years left of life. A blink of an eye. And I am no more. But the future I leave my little boy? It concerns me Blackjack. It sure does. I can't afford to not care.
I don't really give IQ much credit. Some person handed my father the results of a school based IQ test long ago. I am a 142 apparently. What the hell does it mean? Not much. I can go and get hit by a truck and have some neuro-cognitive decline of a drastic nature. At that stage having universal health insurance would be critical,and the necessary infrastructure, and trauma care available to survive it. Months or years of physical and neurological therapy as well. All of us are vulnerable to the whims of fate or accident. Dumb luck. Or Divine Intervention. Privilege is ultimately fragile Blackjack.
What is empirical true Senor Blackjack? According to a brilliant book I bought when my little baby was born about how babies learn? They are born with all cylinders firing off and little sponges of exponential learning capacities. You can see it on the big screen there with your medical coding software. The infant brain is a great thing. A phenomenon of power. So are many aspects of infant characteristics. That as adults we no longer have. The sleep cycles of small children are very deep and very interesting. Empirically speaking they are quite great. But if you see them as ínferiors? That is as far as you will get in understanding what makes babies brains tick. I am interested in how they process language so fast and perfectly. While adults acquiring new languages do it imperfectly, with accents and making errors so obvious, that native speakers can tell if a person speaks that language as a native or not right away. I learned English Blackjack at the age of 5 years old. Spoke only Spanish before then. No one says "Öh Tainari you must have spoken another language. You got an accent on your English"and this or that. They just assume I never spoke Spanish. No accent different than a native speaker. The same for my mother and father. They instead are surprised I speak other languages with equally native fluency. Why can a kid do that? A five year old? And an adult can't eh? Fascinating. They are not the ínferior you think they are Blackjack. They are just different.
I won't get into the political or legal history of marriage. Suffice it to say many alliances were not about love or romance. But convenience, self interest, property and negotiating and bartering. But humans do need companionship as well.
I won't argue with you about how you have lived your love life Blackjack. It looks like you were never in love. Some scientists studied the mental and emotional states of being in love of humans. It is interesting what they found out. I did not get your luck with love. I got some serious love in this life. For that I am eternally grateful. I think one scientist and psychologist stated that being in love was a state that is about the opposite feelings of fear. Love and fear are two of the most primal of human emotional states. It is also about pain and pleasure at the same time. About a lot of interesting things. It sure does feel damn good to be in love and to be loved. Emotions do have an influence on actions or inaction for sure. Erich Fromm is the psychological expert I like for my politics Blackjack. He deals with the concept of love and reason overcoming instinct in human beings. Who knows how much we are built to want love or be loved in our psychologies and physical existences?
I think Blackjack it would be presumptious of me to speculate about your own emotional relationships. I don't think it is my place to do so. But? I do think you are a good thinker. Maybe being a good lover can be there someday for you hand in hand? It might make you happier.....just suggesting?
No, what I am arguing is placing a value judgment on something that is not about some class system you justify in your head. You have to have that need for superior/inferior judgment. Not placed there by mother nature,but by your human error filled power based fear, fear in sharing power or losing power through your political formation BJ. In a socially and erroneously static state, that doesn't have a scientific basis really, to something never meant to be judged that way by you, or of your political persuasion. It is in error. It lacks complexity and empirical techniques. Start with giving people good diets, good educations, good housing, stability, rights, and invest in the entire human people. And then you can do the luxury of believing you are living in a true meritocracy.
Buenas noches BJ. I edited finally got the time!
blackjack21 wrote:I would hardly characterize my opinion as a philosophy. I decided quite some time ago to reject American propaganda as a thought experiment, and used it to argue against leftists. What I found was that my empirical case was far stronger when I did that, and finally reached a point where I could no longer defend radical egalitarianism.
I don't accept your explanation Blackjack. I think you are justifying your own privileges and don't really care about equality because in your paradigm of nationalism you see yourself and your individual interests as primordial and your ethnic group and class category as primordial. In other words, you don't want to know, or even contemplate any equality. It doesn't serve your interests. Period. I won't make excuses for you Blackjack. You are a class conscious snob person, with a need to not have his taxes confiscated by a 'left leaning' state apparatus. Period. Empirical knowledge if it contradicts your own class conscious self interest? Will be roundly rejected by you. Very few or none of your class Blackjack21 commit (suicidio de clase) or class suicide. Yep, you fall into that category quite neatly. It also answers why the Brahmin doctor friend of yours does the same. Class identification. It bolsters my argument of class being linked to almost all forms of discrimination of the lower classes, and it also solidifies a power based relationship. Nothing new there for me to do.
I'm not exactly oppressing you Tainari88. That is in your imagination.
Lol. Sure, you are Blackjack. Didn't you try putting me down with moron and idiot? Lol. Verbal abuse. But since I don't give a damn about that part of oppression? No me importa. If all the successful women in my family had listened to that bullshit from a bunch of class conscious discriminators over the years? And it kept them from accomplishing things? Life would be truly full of stupidity now wouldn't it? You also judge people by how much money they make, or if their nation is financially solvent or not. The USA's deficit is pretty high. A lot of bankruptcies in the USA. Interesting I ran across a youtube video of the ten 'most' intelligent people in the world. A few had some low brow, fairly low paid work. Money did not motivate them. Hmmm? Different value system maybe?
Should I make sweeping statements about how 'valuable' the entire country is due to this problem? (financial insolvency).Lol. I put the blame where it goes--who is causing the financial issues? Identify them and hold them accountable. Usually it is some globalist multinational international capitalist class elites. Bankers. Elites and their powerful apparatuses. I don't equate ordinary working people, middle class people as the respresentative of why a nation fails financially. Not if it is under some form of capitalism Blackjack. Most nations are.
I think it is an interesting thought exercise for women who claim the United States is sexist to try any other country in the world that they think is less sexist. I don't think there are many places you would find more accommodating. Britain has had two female prime ministers but tends to be more sexist culturally than the United States, and it is getting worse since their immigrant population is inherently sexist. France? Well, there's Marine Le Pen... Do you think Merkel makes Germany less sexist than the United States?
Blackjack, there is a lot of things going on in many nations. Some of them good, and some of them bad. One has to choose what kinds of problems one chooses to deal with. The solution is not for all the non-Americans to be wanting to pull up stakes and move to the USA. The solution for most nations is to create enough stability economically, socially and politically to be able to have people prefer to stay put in their native nations and avoid the hassle, problems and instability and risk that goes hand-in-hand with immigrating to another country. Thinking your own nation is living in isolation from the claws of neoliberalism, and its need to be incesting itself, with other countries to perpetuate the same economic system, but in a much less developed form, that leads to a consistently worse economic shape than the first world countries are in, is the epitome of short-sightedness. That is why I think your brand of nationalism is short-sighted, and not intelligent in the long run. The structure is going to break you in half always. Got to work with what is here and developed. You can't revert to past shit (your brand of nationalism),that no longer works, or was shown by history, to run into such horrific problems, that they wind up losing to liberal forms of power.
It's also completely broke, so I don't know if I would be bragging about that.
It is broke. Which makes it a dangerous place to be pushing sexism, racism,and colonialism, and to squeeze unrealistic forms of repayment Blackjack. You can't charge people money they can't repay, the plan is buying a land base for fire sale pricing. Puerto Rico is not the only one to be targeted by those vulture banksters. It makes the island a powder keg of violence, and rebellion in the near future, if it continues on the road it is currently on. I am pro independence on that issue. I think Puerto Rico is another culture, has another history, and never was meant to coalesce into, and integrate itself, with the USA. The Puerto Ricans voted against becoming USA citizens in 1917, before and during the Jones Act Blackjack. You read the insular cases and found them very bizarre. I remember reading your opinion on that. So? Bizarre shit, and weird colonial relationships, with your kind of Virgin Island, Libertarian style no-taxation haven. That is what Puerto Rico faces now. Crypto currency moguls (Puerto cryptos),descending on the island wanting to buy up cheap land and be free of taxes from Uncle Sam. Create the island in their own plan and image. They had a meeting with a bunch of Puerto Ricans. Do you want me to post the video? How that went over? It is not pretty. The privileged like you? Men with money that they want to be free from the claws of liberal taxation needs to move to some islands in the Caribbean. They don't give a shit about some Puerto Ricans that lived there for 500 years and more and who speak Spanish, and are not interested in moving to a USA state. They want to remake the island as if there was no one there for five plus centuries. If they continue with that bullshit? I predict they will get some problems with the locals. For sure. Why is there trouble in paradise Mr. Jones aka Blackjack? The inferiors? No. The greedy. Lol.
You think this is going to work in the long run for the best for the USA? For the Caribbean region? For the world? I don't think it is. You are going to have angry people over time. Or people moving into the USA. To your neck of the woods. Spanish speakers and with college degrees and without them moving there to find work. More pressure. More Latinos moving in. Why? The bad decisions by the greedy. And the 'multicultural'. Who don't care about lily whitness and white race dominance either. Nationalism. Dead again with this stuff.
You might love it for your financial portfolio @blackjack21. A man who hates paying taxes. But you got to go and physically live there (6 months out of the year). Among the Puerto Ricans, or you may pay to live in gated communities, far from the rabble that broke into your place and left your China behind. Rabble American and islanders. Not quite isolated well enough. I will tell you this? The cops have left by the tens of thousands. From 27,000 cops to 7,000 cops left and they say crime is going up due to that. Why? The banks want to be paid first before teachers, clinics, road repair, water pipes repair, sewage updates, government employees, pensions for public sector employees and retirement, cop, fire fighters etc. So? The local Puerto Rican cops LEFT. To get a higher paying job in the mainland. Make more money, and get some real benefits and pay. With running water that is predictable, and electricity not mired in FEMA rules of backward grid types, and corrupt deals from local and federal government contractors. Also get decent public school funding. They left. You move there to protect your money? You might get some problems with the locals. The non criminal and the criminal. But if tax havens are all you care about? Give it a shot?
And if some American tax dodgers get shot by some radical Puerto Ricans pissed off at bad economic conditions while the class conscious think their stuff is untouchable? and make the news? They need to analyze what exactly did they do to shake up such hatred? Think about that. You can brag about saving some taxes as some crazy Boricuas shot you in the ass out of what? Snobbery? Lol. I think Naomi Klein covered it in her little book, "Battle for Paradise: Disaster Capitalism". I like Anthony Bourdain's take on it Blackjack. I will put in his short take on the situation on the island. Eh? Women running the show has nothing to do with failure. It is the power relationship and banks. Something the USA may have issues with too. You nationalists will have a mighty battle with those people as well trying to not destroy your imagined meritocracy and every class in its proper genetically determined slot place, una mierda as a thought as well.
So are the French and the Italians.
Latinos. Lol. I don't know. All roads lead to Rome for many people. You made me smile with this one. I am smiling. No jodas hombre!
Ok. Let's try Kenya, Japan, or Malaysia then. They are very different countries with very different cultures and languages. Is this "sexism" based upon some shared hatred of women? Or is it more or less reflecting the natural state of affairs?
How many times do I hate to repeat to you something Blackjack21? Eh? Sin verguenza (shameless man)? Human beings shape their society according to many factors culturally and economically. I am old fashioned with my research methods in cultural anthropology. You go out there do your 'thick description' and ethnographic studies and cultural studies and historical and empirical research. What are similar human traits? Why do they differ? What are the underpinning causations behind it? Power relationships? Do they change over time and why? Is there a pattern? It gets interesting. One of the most prolific and best selling authors of feminist literature is Japanese. Did I know this? No. Had to do research. It turns out feminist graphic novels and lit for reading on a bus, train or subway in Tokyo is about feminist perspectives. Spain as well. The shit one digs up about culture is almost endless Blackjack. No use making sweeping statements outside of cultural contexts. Culture is one of those great mysteries still in this world. My father was a linguist. His obsession were origins of words and dictionaries and tracing the origin of language families. No matter how hard the linguists tried? Could not get a hold of the first spoken human language and who spoke it first and why a grammar emerged. Too complex. Languages are living things. So are cultures. They emerge, die off, and another takes it place. Then you got places like Israel that revive dead languages to create an 'ethno/religious/cultural' state. It is fascinating really.
I'm more or less of the same persuasion. That's why I find all the "Trump is a sexist" stuff immensely funny. Who cares if he is a cannibal? As long as he cuts my taxes and gets the government out of my life, I frankly don't care.
I can't think that way Blackjack. I see my relationship to many others and other cultures, languages and nations and class of peoples? As all interlinked. I see things like nature does. She doesn't create boundaries and borders. She deals with topographies and tectonic plates, metamorphic rock, versus magma or shale, etc everything in an interdependent system relying on the existence of each other in a very cyclical and cause and effect style of natural manifestation. One part of the system is dysfunctional? It has to correct it somehow to gain balance. Humans are not separate from that system. I frankly care if we can't get our shit together in time to avoid disaster. If we don't care about large groups of people losing out on being able to stay stable? You will get mass immigration, resource scarcity, pollution and scientific disaster....in the making. I have a little boy of 7 years. I don't give a shit about my future anymore. I am old. Fifty three I turned three days ago. I may have 20 more years left of life. A blink of an eye. And I am no more. But the future I leave my little boy? It concerns me Blackjack. It sure does. I can't afford to not care.
People used to yammer on about doctors and lawyers being "elite." My father was a medical doctor. When I was a kid, most medical doctors were white men. Look around you today. Most doctors are Asian. They still make a better living than mechanics, for example. Are they oppressors now that they are not predominantly white men? What about Indian CEOs? I have a good friend who is from India (Brahmin). You might find it surprising, but in these debates he would more often than not side with me. The funny thing in America is that leftists would scarcely believe we were friends, because he has dark skin. He votes Republican, and lives in a pretty tony neighborhood. If you want to understand that dynamic, the best way to do that would be to read Charles Murray. However, he is derided as racist. The IQ argument is the most easily backed up by empirical evidence.
I don't really give IQ much credit. Some person handed my father the results of a school based IQ test long ago. I am a 142 apparently. What the hell does it mean? Not much. I can go and get hit by a truck and have some neuro-cognitive decline of a drastic nature. At that stage having universal health insurance would be critical,and the necessary infrastructure, and trauma care available to survive it. Months or years of physical and neurological therapy as well. All of us are vulnerable to the whims of fate or accident. Dumb luck. Or Divine Intervention. Privilege is ultimately fragile Blackjack.
You can believe that all you like. However, that is ideology speaking. It is not empirically true.
What is empirical true Senor Blackjack? According to a brilliant book I bought when my little baby was born about how babies learn? They are born with all cylinders firing off and little sponges of exponential learning capacities. You can see it on the big screen there with your medical coding software. The infant brain is a great thing. A phenomenon of power. So are many aspects of infant characteristics. That as adults we no longer have. The sleep cycles of small children are very deep and very interesting. Empirically speaking they are quite great. But if you see them as ínferiors? That is as far as you will get in understanding what makes babies brains tick. I am interested in how they process language so fast and perfectly. While adults acquiring new languages do it imperfectly, with accents and making errors so obvious, that native speakers can tell if a person speaks that language as a native or not right away. I learned English Blackjack at the age of 5 years old. Spoke only Spanish before then. No one says "Öh Tainari you must have spoken another language. You got an accent on your English"and this or that. They just assume I never spoke Spanish. No accent different than a native speaker. The same for my mother and father. They instead are surprised I speak other languages with equally native fluency. Why can a kid do that? A five year old? And an adult can't eh? Fascinating. They are not the ínferior you think they are Blackjack. They are just different.
That is a religious precept and has zero meaning in a government that rejects religion. That is like saying that marriage is about love when the word love doesn't occur at all in our law. However, such rhetoric does fool people who get their convictions from their emotions more than their thoughts.
I won't get into the political or legal history of marriage. Suffice it to say many alliances were not about love or romance. But convenience, self interest, property and negotiating and bartering. But humans do need companionship as well.
I won't argue with you about how you have lived your love life Blackjack. It looks like you were never in love. Some scientists studied the mental and emotional states of being in love of humans. It is interesting what they found out. I did not get your luck with love. I got some serious love in this life. For that I am eternally grateful. I think one scientist and psychologist stated that being in love was a state that is about the opposite feelings of fear. Love and fear are two of the most primal of human emotional states. It is also about pain and pleasure at the same time. About a lot of interesting things. It sure does feel damn good to be in love and to be loved. Emotions do have an influence on actions or inaction for sure. Erich Fromm is the psychological expert I like for my politics Blackjack. He deals with the concept of love and reason overcoming instinct in human beings. Who knows how much we are built to want love or be loved in our psychologies and physical existences?
I think Blackjack it would be presumptious of me to speculate about your own emotional relationships. I don't think it is my place to do so. But? I do think you are a good thinker. Maybe being a good lover can be there someday for you hand in hand? It might make you happier.....just suggesting?
I have not argued otherwise. You seem to be drawing the conclusion that not finding equal value is finding no value. It's a binary consideration for you. It is not for me.
No, what I am arguing is placing a value judgment on something that is not about some class system you justify in your head. You have to have that need for superior/inferior judgment. Not placed there by mother nature,but by your human error filled power based fear, fear in sharing power or losing power through your political formation BJ. In a socially and erroneously static state, that doesn't have a scientific basis really, to something never meant to be judged that way by you, or of your political persuasion. It is in error. It lacks complexity and empirical techniques. Start with giving people good diets, good educations, good housing, stability, rights, and invest in the entire human people. And then you can do the luxury of believing you are living in a true meritocracy.
Buenas noches BJ. I edited finally got the time!
Last edited by Tainari88 on 08 Jan 2019 14:56, edited 1 time in total.
La historia de mi amor
se pudiera encontrar
en cada corazón,
en cada soledad.
Silvio Rodriguez
se pudiera encontrar
en cada corazón,
en cada soledad.
Silvio Rodriguez