Ter wrote:So OK, what should they do then ?
Visit prostitutes ? No, very bad. Verboten.
Get a realistic sex doll ? No, very bad, Verboten.
From what I saw here, only masturbation would be allowed and politically correct.
In my first post in this thread:
Pants-of-dog wrote:Go out and do stuff. If you want to meet real live people, it is easiest when going out to organised social activities. Examples include church, local sports leagues, community theatre, political activism, and neighbourhood parties. Yes, it is possible that you will meet the love of your life on a political internet forum, but most of us are not so incredibly lucky.
If you still cannot get a date after that, maybe the problem is that you are not attractive, kind, intelligent, funny, rich, or creative.
Because most men who are at least one of these things can usually find a partner if he goes out and socialises.
If men need society and/or the state to force women to like men, then the problem is men.
Or go to South East Asia and pick a young beautiful sexy one that would marry you for your money and place in society.
This is obviously @Godstud bait.
SolarCross wrote:Maybe we shouldn't and arguably a social darwinist should be happy they don't get dates but if we don't care about them getting dates why should we care about them getting jobs or getting paid more for those jobs or having any income at all? There is some very selective "caring" going on here.
Yes, your idea that we should force women to distribute sex equally, but everything else should be unequal, is very selective.
Anyway, do you have evidence that these herbivore males are lonely because of sexual liberation?
Sc wrote:The presence of some polygamy proportionately causes some inceldom, the more polygamy the more inceldom.
Please provide evidence for this claim.
Sc wrote:That's how it shakes out both by observation and logical necessity due to the asymmetries in biology of sexual reproduction. I realise you don't really accept the existence of sexual dimorphism so this basic reality is difficult for you to process. I can explain in detail the ins and outs of why it happens if you like.
I have observed women being polygamous, and I have not observed men being more polygamous except in those societies where men were allowed but women were not.
Nor does it seem logically necessary due to our biology. So, yes, please explain this.
SC wrote:Link please.
It is in the last thread you started about how we should control women’s sexuality. Remember that you tried to use a Marxist argument, but your fellow right wingers used the abortion argument instead?