How can a human throw a "word?" No one is playing games with you. No one really wants to play with you. You're just getting your paranoid hopes up.
Sure, let's be clearer.
When I say you're throwing buzz words, what I mean is that when you keep throwing around the words sexist, oppressive, etc and calling everything sexist and oppressive, that's using strawman points and ad hominems, not presenting an argument.
Socialism is an economic system. So why are you a socialist? And what economic definition of socialism are you using? In other words, what is your ideal socialist economy?
Social (direct, not mediated) ownership of the resources and means of production. Base standard across the field.
Fair, not equal, distribution of resources above the base standard. Social liberty achieved through economic liberty, which itself achieved through the previous principles.
I believe the system should be structured to achieve fairness, reward hard work, guarantees economic security and liberty, and guarantee social liberties.
For how, I've discussed my policies and politics many times elsewhere in this forum, no need to waste time repeating here.
"Marxism" is a social construct created by socialists and non/anti socialists because when revolutionary socialism first was collectively popular in the second half of the 19th century, many people thought it made no sense, it was insane, bizarre, and even "mentally ill!" Marx was a doctor of whom was educated in some of the most advanced empires at the time. So any scientific or revolutionary socialist had to use the term "Marxist" so that they wouldn't be shunned by some reactionary like @Truth To Power. No one can follow "Marxism." Anyone who claims to follow "Marxism," or "believes in socialism" is not a socialist.
Socialism is a base economic model, it's not a set of policies. What it is is literally in the name.
Marxism is a political and social set of principles. I agree with some, disagree with others of it.
The part you're provoking is that of class struggle. I disagree with that.
Personal wealth should not be restricted if fairly earned.
Society will always have hierarchies, if not through economic means then through other means like expertise, etc.
A fair and just society does not, and can not be achieved through injustice.
And a classless society can not be achieved in general since humans are biologically driven to establish hierarchies.
"No worries?" Your emotional tantrums are not effective. Your emotional ways of thinking make you sound conservative, and sound like you were brainwashed by capitalist tools such as religion or emotional constructs.
Conservatives will say I'm brainwashed by lefties, and lefties will say I'm brainwashed by conservatives.
Science can be racist or sexist.
It can't. Science is inherently beyond good and evil, beyond discrimination, beyond prejudice, beyond everything human. It is objective.
Race realism is an example.
Race realism is some bullshit psuedo science that far right lunatics created to masquerade their racism as scientific.
It's not, and their claims have been discredited countless times.
Now, I am very much for science, but science can be used by the right wingers like @Truth To Power.
Someone using science to justify their positions is reflective of them.
Science itself is not on anyone's side.
You're not stating any facts.
I am stating facts, and not very complex ones really, rather easily proven and observable facts that we can see in application all around us, with immense amounts of evidence supporting it.
Your bitching from capitalist tools that were used to prevent, and to destroy socialist realizations.
If by capitalist tools you mean my laptop, then I'm sorry to tell you that you're using those tools as well.
So far though, I'm not the one bitching, you're the one complaining how everything is sexist and oppressive. I'm merely pointing out that you don't know what you're talking about.
For the whole "destroying socialist realizations". That's just more bullshit.
The soviet union wasn't destroyed by capitalism, it was destroyed by corruption and tyrannic abuses of power within it.
The various "socialist" states we've been seeing going around are ones where a handful few on top control everything and oppress everyone. That's not socialism honey, that concentration of power and wealth within a state is what is usually referred to as fascism.
Venezuela isn't being "destroyed" by capitalism, it's being destroyed by the corruption, incompetence, lack of far thought, and abuse of power of its ruling class.
The same pretty much applies to most other so-called socialist states.
If anything, socialism so far has been a theoretical ideal rather than an applied one.
And personally, I also lean towards pragmatism. If at some point I came to believe that the ideals I wish to see in a system can be achieved more successfully in a system other than socialism, I'll follow that instead, because I care about principles more than ideologies.