Trump and Russiagate - Page 238 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the USA and Canada.

Moderator: PoFo North America Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
User avatar
By Hindsite
#15017996
Godstud wrote::lol: You completely ignore what Trump says about them. Trump compliments the Dictators. He didn't compliment the Queen.

The president called the Queen a "great, great woman."

As part of Donald Trump's three-day state visit to the U.K., tonight the Queen honored the US president with a state banquet at Buckingham Palace. At the event Trump took the opportunity to praise Her Majesty and the longstanding cooperation between the United States and England, referring to Queen Elizabeth as a "great, great woman" as he lauded her service to her her country as a mechanic during WWII.

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/socie ... et-speech/
User avatar
By Godstud
#15017997
Yes, but the Queen doesn't kill off her rivals. :lol: Putin and his gang of Dictators, do. There are big differences between them that you simply fail to see, or are too stubborn to accept because it would show Trump in a poor light.

Trump cultists think Trump can do know wrong, since they're simply not smart enough to see reality.
User avatar
By Hindsite
#15018003
Godstud wrote:Yes, but the Queen doesn't kill off her rivals. :lol: Putin and his gang of Dictators, do. There are big differences between them that you simply fail to see, or are too stubborn to accept because it would show Trump in a poor light.

Trump cultists think Trump can do know wrong, since they're simply not smart enough to see reality.

I understand all of that. However, there is still such a thing as diplomacy, which you fail to understand.
However, my point was to prove you wrong about Trump not complimenting the Queen.
By Sivad
#15018455
Lawsuit outs Ellen Ratner as source for Seth Rich information

Fox News news analyst Ellen Ratner relayed information from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to Texas businessman Ed Butowsky regarding Seth Rich’s role in transferring emails to Wikileaks, according to an amended lawsuit that I filed this morning on behalf of Mr. Butowsky.



Although Ms. Ratner appears on Fox News, she is by no means a Republican or a conservative, and her role in the Seth Rich saga (like that of journalist Sy Hersh) obliterates the Democratic narrative that right-wing zealots fabricated the story about Mr. Rich leaking emails from the Democratic National Committee.

Mr. Rich, a DNC employee, was murdered in Washington, D.C. on July 10, 2016, and the murder remains unsolved. Here’s an excerpt from the amended suit (“RCH” stands for “Russian Collusion Hoax”):

45. Mr. Butowsky stumbled into the RCH crosshairs after Ellen Rattner [sic], a news analyst for Fox News and the White House correspondent for Talk Media News, contacted him in the Fall of 2016 about a meeting she had with Mr. Assange. Ms. Rattner’s brother, the late Michael Rattner, was an attorney who had represented Mr. Assange. According to Ms. Rattner, she made a stop in London during a return flight from Berlin, and she met with Mr. Assange for approximately six hours in the Ecuadorean embassy. Ms. Rattner said Mr. Assange told her that Seth Rich and his brother, Aaron, were responsible for releasing the DNC emails to Wikileaks. Ms. Rattner said Mr. Assange wanted the information relayed to Seth’s parents, as it might explain the motive for Seth’s murder.

46. Upon her return to the United States, Ms. Rattner asked Mr. Butowsky to contact the Rich family and relay the information from Mr. Assange, apparently because Ms. Rattner did not want her involvement to be made public. In the two months that followed, Mr. Butowsky did not attempt to contact the Rich family, but he grew increasingly frustrated as the DNC and #Resistance “journalists” blamed the Russian government for the email leak. On December 16, 2016, Mr. Butowsky sent a text message to Ms. Ratner:

BUTOWSKY [7:10 a.m.]: “Why don’t [sic] you speaking up about email hack?”

RATTNER [9:28 a.m.]: “I have”

Ms. Rattner subsequently told Mr. Butowsky that she had informed Bill Shine, who was then the co-president of Fox News, about her meeting with Mr. Assange in London. Ms. Rattner also informed Fox News producer Malia Zimmerman about her meeting with Mr. Assange.

47. On December 17, 2016, at the instigation of Ms. Rattner, Mr. Butowsky finally contacted Joel and Mary Rich, the parents of Seth, and he relayed the information about Ms. Rattner’s meeting with Mr. Assange. During that conversation, Mr. Rich told Mr. Butowsky that he already knew that his sons were involved in the DNC email leak, but he and his wife just wanted to know who murdered Seth. Mr. Rich said he was reluctant to go public with Seth’s and Aaron’s role in leaking the emails because “we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected.” Mr. Rich said he did not have enough money to hire a private investigator, so Mr. Butowsky offered to pay for one. Mr. Rich accepted the offer and thanked Mr. Butowsky in an email.

48. On December 29, 2016 at 1:51 p.m., Mr. Butowsky sent an email to Ms. Rattner from his iPad: “If the person you met with truly said what he did, is their [sic] a reason you we aren’t reporting it ?” At 3:48 p.m. that afternoon, Ms. Rattner responded as follows: “because— it was a family meeting—- I would have to get his permission– will ask his new lawyer, my sister-in-law.”

The complaint also mentions an interesting development in my ongoing Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the FBI. The feds claimed they had no information pertaining to Seth Rich, but they appear to be changing their tune. Shortly after Attorney General William Barr announced plans to declassify documents related to the Russian Collusion Hoax, the FBI’s attorney informed me that new documents were being processed. I should receive them not later than July 22, 2019. The DNC’s objections to our subpoenas for “Russian hacking’ information are also due on July 22, 2019, and production is due on August 8, 2019.

The more I’ve reviewed the Seth Rich case, the more I’m convinced of its central role in the whole Russian Collusion Hoax. I believe DNC officials knew that the emails would become public as the result of an internal leak, and they knew that the emails would be very damaging, so they attempted to turn the tables by pointing fingers at Donald Trump and the Russians. Hopefully we will know more by next week.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... formation/
User avatar
By jimjam
#15018749
"A fact that’s gotten too little attention is that a good deal of the analysis that went into the decision by the House Judiciary Committee to vote for the impeachment of Richard Nixon in 1974 was the analysis under what’s called the Take Care Clause.

The president takes an oath to uphold the Constitution. Among his duties specified in the Constitution is that he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. Mr. Nixon violated that when he said to Haldeman and Ehrlichman, “We’ve got to stop this Watergate investigation. Tell them it’s national security, so they should just stand down.” That’s failing to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

That’s just one thing. With Mr. Trump you have dozens of things that amount to failing to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. For example, in volume two of the Mueller report, the president is very clearly depicted as instructing senior national security officials, senior national intelligence officials and senior legal officials to lie. And they all say, “Well I can’t say that.” And he says, “Why not?” And they say, “Because that’s not true.” And the president basically says, “Your point?” And that’s just one in a litany of such examples."

William Weld
User avatar
By jimjam
#15018756
"We’re talking about a king here. Donald Trump wants to be a king.

Having steeped myself both in high school and college in the Federalist Papers, and having studied the Constitution and the history of it, including the position of the anti-Federalists, I am pretty well aware of the extent to which the people who wrote our Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787 had one thought uppermost, with the one exception of Alexander Hamilton, and that would be: We don’t want a king. I dare say that Mr. Trump has not read those debates."

William Weld
User avatar
By Hindsite
#15019047
jimjam wrote:William Weld

Isn't that the crazy guy that thinks he can beat President Trump as the Republican nominee for President in 2020?
User avatar
By jimjam
#15019053
Hindsite wrote:Isn't that the crazy guy that thinks he can beat President Trump as the Republican nominee for President in 2020?

Yup ……… a real David for your Goliath. A real patriot unlike the rest of the gutless wonder Republican suck ups.

Has your boy Obese Donald read the Federalist Papers? Does he know they exist :lol: ?
User avatar
By Hindsite
#15019057
jimjam wrote:Yup ……… a real David for your Goliath. A real patriot unlike the rest of the gutless wonder Republican suck ups.

Has your boy Obese Donald read the Federalist Papers? Does he know they exist :lol: ?

We Trump supporters don't even care about any Federalist Papers.
User avatar
By Godstud
#15019062
Educate yourself, @Hindsite. You like to say I don't know anything about USA, but even I've heard about these.

The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. The collection was commonly known as The Federalist until the name The Federalist Papers emerged in the 20th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Federalist_Papers
User avatar
By Hindsite
#15019065
Godstud wrote:Educate yourself, @Hindsite. You like to say I don't know anything about USA, but even I've heard about these.

The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. The collection was commonly known as The Federalist until the name The Federalist Papers emerged in the 20th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Federalist_Papers

I still don't care. I am voting for Trump anyway.
User avatar
By jimjam
#15019171
Hindsite wrote:We Trump supporters don't even care about any Federalist Papers.


Or, obviously, the U.S. Constitution. Maybe you should pack up and leave if you don't love America …………
User avatar
By BigSteve
#15019173
jimjam wrote:"We’re talking about a king here. Donald Trump wants to be a king.


I would rather we have a King Donald than a President Harris, O'Rourke, Sanders, Biden, or any of those other window-lickers running for the Democratic nomination...
User avatar
By jimjam
#15019223
Federal prosecutors signaled in a court document released on Thursday that it was unlikely they would file additional charges in the hush-money investigation that ensnared members of Donald J. Trump’s inner circle and threatened to derail his presidency.

This is what an Authoritarian regime in America looks like. Clear evidence of a criminal conspiracy, that includes perjury, Bank Fraud, wire fraud & lying to FBI & Grand Jury, gets shut down by Trump’s Mob Lawyer Barr. This isn’t justice, it’s a coverup.
User avatar
By BigSteve
#15019247
jimjam wrote:This is what an Authoritarian regime in America looks like. Clear evidence of a criminal conspiracy, that includes perjury, Bank Fraud, wire fraud & lying to FBI & Grand Jury, gets shut down by Trump’s Mob Lawyer Barr. This isn’t justice, it’s a coverup.


I thought that it looked more like this:

Image
User avatar
By jimjam
#15019250
in the Your Tax Dollars At Work dept. …………..2000 civilian and military personnel are on hand at the American prison at Guantanamo Bay to guard 40 prisoners. I guess it's a nice vacation Caribbean posting compliments of the American tax payer. OK, y'all can get back to braying about how trying to help America's 500,000 homeless is "socialism" :lol: .This is off topic but I thought it was a cool example of our wise leadership from above and I didn't know where to slip it in.
#15019315
Trump's playbook:

The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force.
I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few.

The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.
The receptivity of the masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what youv want him to understand by your slogan.


- Adolf Hitler
User avatar
By jimjam
#15019326
Godstud wrote:Trump's playbook:

The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force.
I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few.

The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.
The receptivity of the masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what youv want him to understand by your slogan.


- Adolf Hitler


obviously this is Obese Donald's game. "We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated. " Donald.

Trump "University" anyone :lol: ?

Image
Last edited by jimjam on 19 Jul 2019 04:20, edited 1 time in total.
  • 1
  • 236
  • 237
  • 238
  • 239
  • 240
  • 266

so, Belarus , Mongolia , Finland, Japan , Ukraine,[…]

@JohnRawls No. Your perception of it is not. I […]

Any of you going to buy the Trump bible he's prom[…]

No, it doesn't. The US also wants to see Hamas top[…]