On Lebanon - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All general discussion about politics that doesn't belong in any of the other forums.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

User avatar
By ingliz
#15020741
Palmyrene wrote:something is missing here

The collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

Christians underwent considerable persecution in the death throes of the Ottoman Empire.

Our aim is to get rid of the Christians

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1922)


:)
By Palmyrene
#15020744
ingliz wrote:The collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

Christians underwent considerable persecution in the death throes of the Ottoman Empire.

Our aim is to get rid of the Christians

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1922)


:)


This has what to do with Arabs?

And do you mean the Armenian genocide?
By anasawad
#15020750
@Palmyrene
Dude, I've been to Lebanon and I know this is completely wrong. I've met poor Maronites. Dime the dozen actually. The point of the matter is that your system that you're describing either doesn't work as you think it does or isn't an option for most Maronites.

Where?
Lebanon still has segregated areas, Maronite areas are some of the richest in general.
Furthermore, if you were actually honest and actually met Maronites, you'd have known they have Al-Quwat, Al-Kataeb, The Maronite church, along with various other churches all running well fare programs.
But you don't know any Maronites, nor have been to their areas.

1. It's laughable that you think a majority of your population's country is not poor or working class. It's like how Americans all see themselves as "middle class" when their wealth disparity is noted.

There are easily accessible state and non state maps and stats showing where poverty is concentrated in the country and where each group lives. It's easier since Lebanon is highly segregated with minor exceptions.

2. Ah so all the Arab nationalists live in one place right? Well a study was done by the Doha Institute which, in their Arab opinion index, saw that a majority of Arabs (including Lebanon) support pan-Arabism.

If you're honest and been to Lebanon, ask them where are the Baath party, Syrian nationalist party, and Pan Arabists are concentrated. They'll give you specific areas. And considering that they routinely form gangs, everyone is pretty much familiar with them and where they are in Lebanon.
The fact that you don't know that just comes to show how much you don't know about Lebanon.

2. Ah so all the Arab nationalists live in one place right? Well a study was done by the Doha Institute which, in their Arab opinion index, saw that a majority of Arabs (including Lebanon) support pan-Arabism.

Quote the stat:

Anasawad. We've talked about this. No borders are justified. There is no such thing as a border even if there was a huge natural wall seperating Lebanon from the rest of the world. Even if Lebanon was an island suddenly there would be no borders.

And if we're going for geography, Lebanin rests on the Arabian plate which us a teutonic plate that includes most of Kurdistan too.

:| :|

Simply because the Epic of Gilgamesh refers to Cedar forests does not mean they were referring specifically to the Republic of Lebanon and it's current modern borders.

It refers to the Lebanese cedar forests.

No, they aren't. The oldest fucking inscription of Arabic can be found in Palestine and Lebanon. We've talked about this several times.

Yes, we have, the oldest proto-Arabic text was discovered in the Levant because that's where all alphabets were started.
However, we also showed multiple times that Arabic as a language is believed to originate either from Yemen or Hijaz.

That doesn't indicate they even referred to themselves as Canaanites just that we needed a name for the people who lived in the Near East during the Bronze Age.

Also Lebanese, once again, isn't an ethnicity. No one identifies as ethnic Lebanese.

Then Jews aren't an ethnicity, and Assyrians and Aramaeans aren't either.
Nor is anyone, right ?

I've been to Lebanon several times and most people identified as Arabs so unless you have statistically proof that most Lebanese people do not identify as Arab they are Arabs.

I'm going to Lebanon in a couple of weeks, we'll meet and I'll take you around all of the Beqa' and Maronite and Christian areas so you can ask people whether they identify as Arabs or not.
Though, I'd advice not to argue they are. People are heavily armed in these areas and not very fond of Arabs in general and Syrians in specific.

Which, funny, also another point why I don't believe you actually been to Lebanon and asked or made friends with Maronites and got to know them.
Considering the current situation, they really really dislike Syrians and have even pushed policies to prevent Syrians from working and actively put curfews against Syrians in their areas.
What you describe isn't Lebanon.
And the fact that you're not aware of this fact is more than enough evidence for me to know you've never been to Lebanon and went around.

I've posted a list of every single person from the 11th century onward who identified as Arab done to occupation. Do I need to post it again?

I can post a list of people in Britain who identified as German or Frankish, doesn't mean English people stopped existing.

The taif agreement was about Syria withdrawing from Lebanon. Why would they use Lebanon's Arabness to conquer them if the taif agreement was about them leaving Lebanon?

The Taif agreement forced Lebanon to adjust its constitution to declare it self an Arab country, as well as gave Syria the rights to the port of Beirut, which is an issue still contested to this day with Syria as Lebanon was forced militarily to agree to it.
The timeline in the agreeement not only wasn't followed, but was intended to be after Syria had already ceased most of what it wants. Which is why Syria ended up leaving Lebanon by a revolution not willingly.
Read up on it.

I never said they didn't. Also Arabs who grew up in Lebanon would also be native.

They wont. If that was the case then Palestinians born and growing up in Lebanon would be native as well.
They clearly aren't.

Furthermore, Arabs living in tribes hold the national identity of their tribe, you can see those in Anjar and the areas around it north of Rashia.
Arabs living in the cities don't identify with Lebanon to begin with and identify with the larger Arab world.
An issue ironically discussed with bullets during the civil war.

Yeah Baalbek is the entirety of Lebanon. I don't believe you. You're taking a small town or city in Lebanon and saying they're the majority.

1- Baalbek is the largest province in Lebanon.
2- Baalbek tribes consists of around 20% of the population.

Lebanese identifying as Arabs aren't oppressing you. It's their identity not yours.

They're not. But they do when they try to enforce their identity on others.
Which is another reason for the high segregation in Lebanon.

It's funny how anyone even bothering to look at the maps of Lebanon and the ethnic and demographic distributions would easily see this and there are even entire books and even wars fought on this issue (including a key part of the civil war), yet you don't know about it.
Either you don't know anything about Lebanon, nor have ever been to Lebanon. Or you just don't understand what you read if you read it.

What is now modern day Lebanon was either a bunch of city states who didn't identify as Lebanese at all or was the part of empires. Just liks Syria and Iraq and Jordan and Palestine.

The Greeks were a bunch of city states, the Assyrians were a bunch of city states, the Persians were a bunch of city states and kingdoms, etc.
That's how all nations started, it doesn't stop them from being nations.
But ofcourse, You already previously said that Persia didn't exist until Alexander of Macedonia came along, so I'm gonna assume you also don't understand anything about this topic.

That's false. I've been to only the biggest areas of Lebanon and most people identified as Arab.

Which is?
Go on, I want you to tell me which area you've been to.
Because, here is the thing, I know which area is the largest with the most population and not only lived there for a couple of years, but I also know many who live there, so if you actually been there I can know who you are with a couple of phone calls and verify everything you say.
Furthermore, How do you know they identify as Arabs? You went around asking?
And since we're assuming you're now 15 years old, then it must have happened when you're younger; How did you do all these "surveys" when you were that young?

You mean minorities? And only upper class Maronites don't identify as Arab. I know this from experience.

No you don't.
First because there is no way you've met anyone from the Maronite upper class since most live in heavily gaurded areas where very few are allowed to go in (something anyone who've ever been to Lebanon for a while would've easily noticed), and secondly because Maronites, on average, hate Arabs and large portions of Muslims and actively take actions against them.
Again, something anyone who've been to Lebanon recently or even followed Lebanese news would've easily noticed.


They don't.

There are atleast 14 million Lebanese people right now, what's the percentage of Maronites is in your opinion?

How can pan-Arabists brainwash vast swathes of the population while most Lebanese simulatenously don't identify as Arabs and, presumably, hate Arabs.

Your population, not ours.

It just comes across as you using pan-Arabism as a boogey man. It's basically Umberto Eco's fascism where the enemy has to be strong but also weak at the same time.

Not really; You see, a boogy man is something that doesn't exist, while Arab nationalists and Islamic nationalists alongside them not only exist but are actively waging wars and committing massacres and genocides all over the place and have been doing so for centuries.

So a majority of the population? Also they're pan Arabist not Baathist. Baathism is different.

Baathism is Arab nationalism mixed with Socialism. Pan-Arabism is part of Baathism.
I'm sure you'd have noticed that fact if you read the history of the region in the past few decades, but that would be too much to ask of you I assume.

Yeah no poverty doesn't just disappear after you stop calling yourself Arab. That's completely ridiculous.

It's like saying if you remove all the Jews then life will be great. In fact that's exactly what Nazis said.

When you switch system and policy, you can indeed solve poverty.

Dude poor people don't have one geographical area where they live. They're everywhere. Sidon or Beruit has homeless people and poor areas everywhere. Unemployment is pretty high. Things aren't great.

Yet apparently you ignore all of this to cherry pick Hezbollah or Palestinian territories and say "these are the only poor people". No, they aren't.

The country is currently going through a recission, that indeed is true. However, Poverty is mostly prevelant in certain areas.

Now, here a little test, since you've been to Lebanon and know these areas.
What're the flags usually raised there? There are plenty of flags and banners signifying movements and who's in control in an area, and if you've been there you must have noticed them since they're everywhere.
In those poor areas, which flags and banners are raised?
Last edited by anasawad on 23 Jul 2019 20:24, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Zionist Nationalist
#15020754
Furthermore, if you were actually honest and actually met Maronites, you'd have known they have Al-Quwat, Al-Kataeb, The Maronite church, along with various other churches all running well fare programs.
But you don't know any Maronites, nor have been to their areas.



he also claimed that he traveled to the US spoke to Jews and they all said that Israel is a shithole and racist country
that dosent make alot of sense because there are very very few Jews who would say that there are many who could criticize Israel for different reasons but I dont believe they would say to him those things also how can a 15 years old Syrian know english so well? dosent make much sense to me and it dosent make sense that he or his family would be permitted to travel to the US unless they are very rich
User avatar
By ingliz
#15020755
Palmyrene wrote:the Armenian

No, the Syrian* persecution, where the Muslim Arabs were willing participants, killing their Christian neighbours.

According to historian Philip Hitti, approximately 900,000 Syrians arrived in the United States between 1899 and 1919 (more than 90% of them Christians).

* The term Syria in those days was generally used to denote the whole of geographical and historic Syria, that is to say the whole of the country lying between the Taurus Mountains and the Sinai Peninsula, which was made up of part of the Vilayet of Aleppo, the Vilayet of Bairut, the Vilayet of Syria, the Sanjaq of the Lebanon, and the Sanjaq of Jerusalem. It included that part of the country which was afterwards detached from it to form the mandated territory of Palestine.

Report of a Committee set up to consider certain correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon (his majesty's high commissioner in egypt) and the Sharif of Mecca in 1915 and 1916


:)
By Palmyrene
#15020771
@anasawad

I wrote a reply but my computer couldn't find the IP address for some reason and now all my work is gone.

I swear to fucking god. Why does this site suck balls? It can suck my dick.
By Palmyrene
#15020772
Zionist Nationalist wrote:he also claimed that he traveled to the US spoke to Jews and they all said that Israel is a shithole and racist country
that dosent make alot of sense because there are very very few Jews who would say that there are many who could criticize Israel for different reasons but I dont believe they would say to him those things also how can a 15 years old Syrian know english so well? dosent make much sense to me and it dosent make sense that he or his family would be permitted to travel to the US unless they are very rich


You do know that Jews in the US don't support Israel right?
By Palmyrene
#15020773
ingliz wrote:No, the Syrian* persecution, where the Muslim Arabs were willing participants, killing their Christian neighbours.

According to historian Philip Hitti, approximately 900,000 Syrians arrived in the United States between 1899 and 1919 (more than 90% of them Christians).

* The term Syria in those days was generally used to denote the whole of geographical and historic Syria, that is to say the whole of the country lying between the Taurus Mountains and the Sinai Peninsula, which was made up of part of the Vilayet of Aleppo, the Vilayet of Bairut, the Vilayet of Syria, the Sanjaq of the Lebanon, and the Sanjaq of Jerusalem. It included that part of the country which was afterwards detached from it to form the mandated territory of Palestine.

Report of a Committee set up to consider certain correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon (his majesty's high commissioner in egypt) and the Sharif of Mecca in 1915 and 1916


:)


1. You just mentioned Ottoman persecution.

2. Your evidence of this is Syrians going to the US in large numbers?

3. This has what to do with Lebanon?
User avatar
By Zionist Nationalist
#15020780
Palmyrene wrote:You do know that Jews in the US don't support Israel right?


Most of them support Israel but they having a problem as they are majority democrat supporters and the democrat party is anti Israel nowadays.
they are liberal but they dont really understand whats going on here and they still rely on the fake news media(CNN MSNBC all those crappy mainstream channels) to tell them what is going on here
I think if some crazy bitch like AOC will be elected Jews in the US will either switch support to republican or flee to Israel and other countries
By Palmyrene
#15020785
Zionist Nationalist wrote:Most of them support Israel but they having a problem as they are majority democrat supporters and the democrat party is anti Israel nowadays.


No they were either anti-Israel or just indifferent before. The Democrats themselves aren't really anti-Israel.
By anasawad
#15020795
@Palmyrene
1. You just mentioned Ottoman persecution.

2. Your evidence of this is Syrians going to the US in large numbers?

3. This has what to do with Lebanon?

The Sunni population of Syria primarily has committed several large scale massacres against Christians in the past 2 centuries. This is why all the key Christian towns are in the mountains, and this is why Christian Maronites are spread around the world. They were refugees.
This is also one of the main reason Lebanon has segregated areas, and likewise why Christians don't like Arabs and Muslims.

This is why your claim that Maronites identify as Arabs and with the Arabs is laughable to anyone who knows anything about the region.
I don't need to even bother refuting a source that says Lebanese people, majority of which are Maronites, identify as Arabs since they've been oppressed and persecuted by the Arabs for many many centuries and hate them as a result, as such it is self-evident that whatever source you bring to claim that they identify with the Arabs is a propaganda source from one of the many Arab nationalists.

Baalbek tribes are heavily mixed with Christians in Lebanon and as such hold the same position.

That is why, during the civil war, both Christians and Shias invited and welcomed Israeli forces.
Which I, with all my criticism and routine bashing of Israel, am thankful for that intervention because if there was one true savior of Lebanon from the invading Islamist brotherhood groups along with the various Salafist groups and the Arab nationalist flooding the country from all over, it was Israel.
The hostility between Lebanon and Israel did not start because of the intervention, the Israeli intervention saved 100s of thousands from being massacred by the various Salafists and Islamists, as has indeed had happened many times before.
The hostility between Lebanon and Israel is the result of the action of the south Lebanon army which was, in essence, a mercenary army hired to hold control of the area on behalf of Israel.

So you saying any of those groups, which represent a large majority of Lebanese people, identify as Arabs is laughable and ludicrous.
User avatar
By ingliz
#15022918
Palmyrene wrote:You just mentioned Ottoman persecution.

For a Syrian, you seem to know very little of your history.

Syria was a part of the Ottoman empire.

Lebanon a part of Ottoman Syria.


:)
By Palmyrene
#15022937
ingliz wrote:For a Syrian, you seem to know very little of your history.

Syria was a part of the Ottoman empire.

Lebanon a part of Ottoman Syria.


:)


Dude, I know.

The point is that the Vilayet of Syria:

1. Has borders completely different from the modern state of Syria. Lebanon wasn't just a part of the Vilayet of Syria, it didn't exist as a concept.

For context here are the borders of the Syria Vilayet:

Image

2. Was under the control of and took orders from the Ottoman Empire.

3. Thus Syria is not responsible for atrocities committed against Lebanon (a state that didn't even exist at the time).

4. Therefore your claim that Lebanon was created because of Syrian persecution is fucking retarded.

5. The person who enacted some of the atrocities you are referring was an Ottoman Pasha.

Nothing you say adds up. Syria as a nation state didn't exist and Lebanon didn't exist as a concept. So you're going to have to explain what fucking Syrian persecution happened when all people, including Europe, saw it as Ottoman territory and how they called for an independent state for Christians if Sykes Picot didn't even happen yet.
User avatar
By ingliz
#15022976
Palmyrene wrote:Sykes Picot didn't even happen yet.

Negotiations began in 1915...

Minutes of the first negotiation on 23 November 1915

an independent state for Christians

Catholic France created Lebanon for the Christian Maronites living in the former Ottoman unit of Mount Lebanon. Their stated intention was to provide a refuge, to protect the Christian population against Druze killing sprees.


:)
Last edited by ingliz on 02 Aug 2019 18:49, edited 1 time in total.
By Palmyrene
#15022977
ingliz wrote:Negotiations began in 1915...

Minutes of the first negotiation on 23 November 1915


The assertion you made was that Syrians were persecuting Christians so France gave them their own country. However the concept of Lebanon and it's state (i.e. Greater Lebanon) only was created after French occupation of the Levant.

Catholic France created Lebanon for the Christian Maronites living in the former Ottoman unit of Mount Lebanon. Their stated intention was to provide a refuge to protect the Christian population against Druze killing sprees.


:)


This is a hilarious claim. The French made Lebanon because they knew, from the King Crane Commission, that the Arabs liked them the least out of the options for mandate so they needed a state that would be loyal to them. Thus, Lebanon was born.
Last edited by Palmyrene on 02 Aug 2019 18:53, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By ingliz
#15022979
Palmyrene wrote:This is hilarious claim

That the Druze were going on killing sprees against their Christian neighbours?
By Palmyrene
#15022980
ingliz wrote:That the Druze were going on killing sprees against their Christian neighbours?


That the France even cared about the Druze killing Christians and that this wasn't just an excuse.
By anasawad
#15022986
, French negotiations with the Ottoman government intensified, targeting important railway concessions in Northern Anatolia and Syria, plus ports on the Black Sea and Syria’s Mediterranean coast. French demands also included the building and protection of convents, churches, schools (under Roman Catholic auspices), and charitable institutions in Palestine, Syria, and Asia Minor, particularly in Jerusalem and Beirut.


Accordingly, ―the foundation on which the French Republic’s material interests lay in the Levant was her moral respectability.


Protecting the region’s Catholics and their clergy also played an important role in traditional French foreign policy. Even the Third Republic’s lay government did not hesitate to extend financial assistance to French
religious schools and to the Jesuit St Joseph University


http://www.levantineheritage.com/pdf/FDI.pdf
By Palmyrene
#15022989
@anasawad

1. This was before WW1 and the creation of Lebanon.

2. This was before Druze massacres against Christians which happened after Sykes-Picot.

3. Originally French investments in the Levant were predominantly economic and quickly became political after the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire, it was then that France quickly began attempting to portray itself as protector of Christians so that they would have political foothold in the region.

If you seriously think a colonial empire would do something like this out of the kindness of it's heart you're just as gullible as the Arabs who trusted the British.
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Canada is a criminal country (a fake country buil[…]

Anomie: in societies or individuals, a conditi[…]

@FiveofSwords " black " Genetically[…]

That is interesting why do you think that is? It[…]