BigSteve wrote:Intelligent people know this.
Liberals are too fucking stupid too realize it...
I don't think that's what is at issue. When normalizing IQ tests for racial disparity, it was discovered that there is a type of intelligence that involves adhering to social expectations. I think that is often a common trait among liberals. In other words, @SpecialOlympian hopes to persuade you to disassociate from Trump by trying to convince you that Trump is unpopular. It's an appeal to a primal fear of abandonment. This is also why you will commonly hear liberals attack people for their intelligence, which is actually a shaming tactic that isn't based on appropriate intelligence assessments.
Additionally, people now routinely lie to pollsters, because poll responders do not want to deal with the anticipated attack from liberals should poll responders indicate a preference for a candidate not sanctioned by the establishment. This was the major disconnect in 2016, and it persists to this day. For example:
The liberals, of course, fact checked Trump's tweet and it turned out to be correct according to the fire marshal; although, Trump only beat Elton John by 200 people. However, it is a fact like this that suggests the polls are not correct. Trump draws crowds like Beatlemania or something. He has rock solid support. Obama could do this too. Hillary could not. Beto O'Rourke shows up to nearly empty rooms. Hillary had a similar--although not quite as bad--problem. So even massive voter fraud in California was not enough to save Hillary Clinton.
Everybody is hip to this now too:
So they plan on a "white supremacy" campaign against Trump, which I think is going to fail as well. Clearly, this is because they cannot run against Trump on their stated policy positions.
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden
- By FiveofSwords
- By Potemkin
- By ingliz
- By Rugoz