Pants-of-dog wrote:Please quote the relevant text from each of your sources so we can determine whether or not these facts are a) true and b) relevant to the claim of systematic destruction.
If you want a definition for “systematic destruction”, please ask @Sivad.
They are very easy to identify claims at the beginning of the articles and I assure you that you can accept the veracity of them -- hence my eagerness to link to them. ^^
I am using the standard definition.
The problem is that status quo
is a highly political definition that changes drastically according to the eye of the beholder.
Do you think two people with as many disagreements as us would recognize the status quo as being the same?
So, what is the status quo?
And again, you now seem to be backing away from the claim that this is a deliberate tactic by the elite, a claim that both yiu and Sivad have made.
Deliberate in the sense that a "shadowy cabal" meets up together and plans it? No.
Yet, it is something that is recognized as occurring, and no one particularly cares to stop at, and those who attempt to stop replacement migration are consciously demonized. Perhaps not by the power brokers themselves per se, but by the mainstream media that largely does the bidding of the power brokers.
I am curious: would you agree that the MSM does as much?
Are you now saying that migration is not the deliberate tactic of a wealthy class?
Immigration is sought, and illegal immigration is tolerated, because it gives them the results that they want.
But, naturally, I do not think there is some conscious effort to do so to replace white people,
but rather it exists to get the most bang for the buck.
I was actually just listening to some Bob Packett this morning and he noted that many of the miners who initially had come to Korea were poor Europeans that were being exploited for their labor and treated as expendable, and this was back in the 1880s . It would be easy to say that this was the same with the Chinese railroad workers, wouldn't it?
There's a long history of exploiting expendable foreigners for cheaper labor costs -- now they are totally even more fine with the idea of unloading them onto the welfare state when they are done, or even having the welfare state supplement their income.
Nothing about this has to be a conscious hatred of the foreigner advanced by the elites -- it is just pure greed. The result is just replacement migration -- of course, there are a few more factors involved, but these aren't being discussed.
Because it provides an alternate explanation for migration that does not depend on your conspiracy theories, and is far more rational and is consistent with economic motives.
I have no idea how you thought that I thought that the elites were bringing people over against their will to replace us.
I have no idea how you think that a single surface explanation is possible.
No one called you racist.
Stop posing as a victim and address your argument.
Right, SO has not come to the thread yet
But, we all know that those who oppose illegal immigration are routinely accused of racism, right?
We were discussing how illegal immigrants will ignore laws and still cross the border if they see the economic gains as outweighing the risks associated with being in the USA illegally.
You now seem to he proposing that a racist totalitarian state would be a solution to this.
Sure, you can do this. But then the fences will be used to keep people in, not out.
One of your issues is that you are ready to jump to conclusions that serve yoru rhetorical purposes.
I was pointing out that it is easy to round up people and to control the situation.
Because you have instituted a racist totalitarian state where Hispanics are kept in concentration camps, and the fences would be to keep these people in concentration camps.
Aw, yes, the joys of hyperbolic fantasy lands.
In fact, please repeat your argument about whatever you are trying to claim here.
Mass migration is taking over historically white & Christian nations, and it is now justified by it being economically necessary. This is the phenomena of replacement migration.
It also serves the long-term goals of politicians on the left -- many of whom will serve multiple decades -- to acquire new voter bases, and it serves the purposes of mega corporations for very obvious reasons of cheap labor & a larger consumer base.
The problem is compounded by feminism and the atomization of WEstern culture, the cost of living and burden of taxes that the middle class and historic white population faces.