anasawad wrote:Great, here we go with the retardation.
Wow getting salty real early are you now?
If he believes that not all collectives are organized, then he should be because he's an idiot.
He doesn't. He just doesn't think they need to hierarchial or that they can be hierarchial. You can't have a collective and have a hierarchies. According to Bakunin, hierarchies are literally the principal of selfishness (although egoists will disagree). This is most obvious in economic hierarchy but can still be seen in political hierarchy.
And no leaderless uprising ever achieves anything, ever.
They do. They just get coopted by other groups.
The Bolshevik revolution had leaders and organizers, far before the revolution even began.
There was no "Bolshevik revolution". There was a Bolshevik faction but the Bolesheviks weren't responsible for starting the revolution.
The Russian people started the revolution and kept on self organizing and doing their own activities. They
drove the revolution, the Bolsheviks just took them over.