- 31 Oct 2019 19:04
#15045733
Still repeating the lie.
Angstroms understanding 100 years ago was incomplete because he didn't have access to the technological advances since WW2 and didn't have the ability to access the atmosphere above ground level.
Richard Lindzen, was one of the the 3% of climate scientists until he retired, every future prediction he had made whilst he was working has been proven false, every temperature estimate and every estimate for levels of water vapour/ CO2
Just one example of how wrong a man can be is his comparison against Hansen and the actual temperature records.
He is in the same group as Singer, for hire scientists who worked for the tobacco industry to deny the effects of smoking and then got picked up by the oil industry to discredit evidence that challenges the use of fossil fuels. The man accuses all other climate scientists of lying for research funding whilst being paid by right wing think tanks like heartland and Cato. I can see why you'd be a fan.
William Happer, - not a climate scientist
Freeman Dyson, - not a climate scientist
Patrick Moore, - not a climate scientist
Truth To Power wrote:But given the water vapor content of the atmosphere, the amount of additional heat CO2 can absorb is minimal. Angstrom established that over 100 years ago.
Still repeating the lie.
Angstroms understanding 100 years ago was incomplete because he didn't have access to the technological advances since WW2 and didn't have the ability to access the atmosphere above ground level.
Richard Lindzen, was one of the the 3% of climate scientists until he retired, every future prediction he had made whilst he was working has been proven false, every temperature estimate and every estimate for levels of water vapour/ CO2
Just one example of how wrong a man can be is his comparison against Hansen and the actual temperature records.
He is in the same group as Singer, for hire scientists who worked for the tobacco industry to deny the effects of smoking and then got picked up by the oil industry to discredit evidence that challenges the use of fossil fuels. The man accuses all other climate scientists of lying for research funding whilst being paid by right wing think tanks like heartland and Cato. I can see why you'd be a fan.
William Happer, - not a climate scientist
Freeman Dyson, - not a climate scientist
Patrick Moore, - not a climate scientist
Last edited by BeesKnee5 on 31 Oct 2019 19:04, edited 1 time in total.