- 10 Nov 2019 23:41
#15047743
Good comeback POD, but I have news for you. If reducing global warming means living under socialism I would rather take my chances with global warming. I cannot think of a greater abomination than been forced to live in an oppressive system like socialism. By definition socialism is always done with the coercion of the state.
I will take my chances with a capitalist solution. The world will not end in 12 years; no worries.
Pants-of-dog wrote:No.
People’s arguments are no less valid because you disagree with their motives.
If a capitalist argued that we should cure cancer because he would make more money if people did not die of cancer, would he be wrong to say we should cure cancer?
Good comeback POD, but I have news for you. If reducing global warming means living under socialism I would rather take my chances with global warming. I cannot think of a greater abomination than been forced to live in an oppressive system like socialism. By definition socialism is always done with the coercion of the state.
I will take my chances with a capitalist solution. The world will not end in 12 years; no worries.