- 06 Jan 2020 14:15
#15058130
No.
I posted all the relevant text so that people could read it for themselves and see that yiu deliberately conflated two separate sentences in order to attack environmentalists even though they had nothing to do with it.
Show me any post anywhere where you have supported Aboriginal control of the land. Or show me anywhere where conservative Australian politicians have done so.
Until then, you are just using people like this to attack environmentalists and ignoring the fact that the entire state apparatus of Australia is ignoring Aboriginal land control.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
colliric wrote:Lol.
Despite him directly referring to those values in this specific sentence:
Now who's ignoring the science? Even from scientists on your own side, lol.
It is "not clear" despite the fact the person made it clear in a specific sentence.
No.
I posted all the relevant text so that people could read it for themselves and see that yiu deliberately conflated two separate sentences in order to attack environmentalists even though they had nothing to do with it.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/it- ... 53okc.html
This Aboriginal man explicitly stated his property was saved by burning traditionally and that the Ecologists, government and National Parks departments caused trouble for him and tried to stop him.
Show me any post anywhere where you have supported Aboriginal control of the land. Or show me anywhere where conservative Australian politicians have done so.
Until then, you are just using people like this to attack environmentalists and ignoring the fact that the entire state apparatus of Australia is ignoring Aboriginal land control.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...