Heisenberg wrote:He said vote for the person you think will win the nomination, not who you want to win the nomination. It's pretty straightforward, and involves making one choice. Leave your personal preference out, and pick who you think will win the Democratic nomination.
Wrong.
Here's what he said: "We have 3 main candidates at this point the rest are not relevant.
also vote for the one you think will win not want to win"
The word "also" would mean "in addition to" or "additionally". In other words, it's asking you to make
two choices.
The way the question reads, at the onset, is pretty obvious. Of the three, who do you think will get the nomination. But then it asks you to pick the candidate who you think doesn't want to be the nominee (that's the "also vote for the one you think will win not want to win" part).
As if that would make any sense at all.
It's a poorly worded question, and is miles away from being straightforward...
Courage is knowing that something will hurt and doing it anyway. Stupidity is the same thing. That's why life is hard...