Finfinder wrote:I think its fitting for anti pet owners to qualify their carbon footprint before they voice their concerns about pet owners.
I would only agree to this statement if we are comparing carbon footprints of people. That is not what I'm doing. Thus, this is irrelevant.
What I am asking is just for he acknowledgement that owning a pet has a non-zero footprint. Irrespective of whatever the fuck all else any person does outside of owning their pet. Seems like a lot of you just don't know how to think.
All of his dancing around with pseudo-logic and strawmen is fucking weird and non-sensical.
Further, I'm not anti-pet, generally speaking.
This is as fucking weird someone that drives pick-truck/prius/whatever saying "well, I recycle and compost, so it's all good." Well, it's certainly nice that this person recycles and composts, but it doesn't change the fact the pickup truck/prius/whatever has emissions associated with it.