- 14 Feb 2020 23:34
#15067277
the population of NH in 1984 was one million, in 95 it was 1.15 million, today it's 1.35 million, so population growth can't even account for half of it.
foxdemon wrote:
We need to take into account population growth ver the period in question. Reagan and Clinton are close to expected taking into account population change. So Trump isn’t much different in support from those presidents. Bush and Obama are the two who are below the norm.
the population of NH in 1984 was one million, in 95 it was 1.15 million, today it's 1.35 million, so population growth can't even account for half of it.
Socialism without freedom is fascism.