Julian658 wrote:Sure, some anecdotes are important. And many kids from a one parent home do OK if they have an exceptional caring mother. Studies are probably better indicators than anecdotes.
Family Influence on Education
Students who grow up in single-parent homes complete fewer years of education and are less likely to earn a college degree, a new report finds.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/201 ... 20families.
pending your teenage years in a single-parent family puts you at a larger educational disadvantage today than it did 40 years ago, claims a new study.
In 2009, young adults who spent time living in single-parent families had completed 1.32 fewer years of schooling than their peers from two-parent families, according to a paper published last week in the academic journal Education Next. The college completion rate also was 26 percentage points lower for 24-year-olds who lived in single-parent homes as teens.
Education Gap Grows for Adolescents from Single-Parent Families
https://www.educationnext.org/education ... -families/
Do children in two-parent families do better?
https://www.bbc.com/news/education-47057787
The list goes on:
However, am exceptional educated mother makes a difference. You also inherited smarts from your parents. Psst, don't tell anyone else. It is not PC to inherit intelligence.
I am having dejavu now, its like we discussed this not long ago. Oh, maybe the dejavu is because we actually discussed this a while ago.
This is not helpful on so many levels. For one, there are a billion different co-founder variables that unless you are willing to start doing unethical population based randomized controlled trials... you are not likely to begin to comprehend the intricacies of their effect. For instance, poverty is certainly a major cause for crime/poor education/etc... do you know that money is often listed as the second most common cause for divorce other than infidelity? So... you got a whole bunch of poor people, in poor neighborhoods... offcourse there is going to be bunch of single parents because money is one of the leading causes for divorce! and this does not even take into acount how many couples split before getting married because of poverty or with poverty being one of the inciting factors.
All of these factors tend to have positive feedback in vicious cycles. Poverty leads to crime/violence leads to abusive relationships leads to divorce leads to traumatized kids which leads to the next cycle of messed up adults to feed the cycle, and each step in the cycle can give positive feedback to the rest.
We will never know for sure which are the individual factors that make the biggest impact because the methods that we would have to use to find out are not ethical or reasonably feasable.
However there are a few things that we can do that directly affects some/many of the major issues that we can identify.
Education,
A minimum floor-level socio-economical support
Community-level interventions
Targetting individuals for REFORM rather than PUNISHMENT. AKA getting rid of ridiculous nonsensical "offenses" that put people in jail for nonsense. Especially those related to drugs and other non-violent crimes. If you ask me, drugs should be legalized, taxed/regulated... all drugs (this is offtopic so wouldn't discuss further, if you wish to open another thread for that).
Child support/maternity leave
Health care. The amount of 30 years old that I see in the hospital with ESRD is astonishing, that's in part because complete lack of routine care, by the time they show up in the late 20's with kidney damage it is too late. Not having insurance and having a major disease like this, almost guarantees that this person and family will never leave poverty in their lifetime. A hospital will not put you in jail if you fail to pay a few hundred thousands dollars, but that debt will follow you for a very long time if not lifelong (in theory bankruptcies might help, but low education people with limited access to financial advisors and attorneys will not be declaring bankruptcy anytime soon).
And many other actions that have been discussed previously.
None of these targets blacks specifically, and I do not subscribe to the philosophy that we should target them to raise this particular group. I think we should strive to raise everybody at the bottom regardless of race.
Now, independently of the socioeconomic problems already described and discussed, we also have rampant racism in this country. This is unacceptable and regardless of what degree it contributes or not to the above, even if minimal contribution (which I do not agree), I think at the very least we should agree that any sort of racism is unacceptable, even if it didn't lead to poverty and violence and all that shit (which again, we don't agree on this, but it is not even important if we agree on this or not because of the aforementioned points/discussion).