- 15 Jul 2020 03:07
#15107559
I presented real-world data regarding children deaths, all deaths, and land encroachment, from the two respective sides.
By 'weakness' are you implicitly acknowledging an *imbalance* of coercive power relations between Israel and the Palestinian population?
Has Israel been able to exercise its political will more readily, against the interests of Palestinians, moreso than vice-versa?
---
Haha.... That's fucking great. Thanks for the belly laugh.
You obviously don't understand how revolutions *work*. They are the most *polarizing* social dynamic imaginable -- look at the U.S. Civil War, for example.
In such a social environment we won't be lazily poking keys on the keyboard to 'diss' a political adversary over the Internet, to put it lightly. Do you think that there will be a dedicated discussion board strictly for 'fencesitters' at such a time?
But, I guess more to-the-point, what would such claims-of-victimhood *amount* to, during the time of a world-revolutionary political situation?
ckaihatsu wrote:
Okay, away from your bullshit abstract moralizing, and back to the real-world, is there a *power relation* between Israel and the Palestinians?
wat0n wrote:
You've been moralizing for a while now, seemingly believing weakness somehow gives you morality. It doesn't, not by itself.
I presented real-world data regarding children deaths, all deaths, and land encroachment, from the two respective sides.
By 'weakness' are you implicitly acknowledging an *imbalance* of coercive power relations between Israel and the Palestinian population?
wat0n wrote:
Israel is militarily stronger than the Palestinians, but it doesn't hold all the cards in their relationship, or else this conflict would have ended already.
Has Israel been able to exercise its political will more readily, against the interests of Palestinians, moreso than vice-versa?
---
ckaihatsu wrote:
Who would counterrevolutionaries even claim victimhood *to*?
x D
wat0n wrote:
Each other, fence-sitters.
Haha.... That's fucking great. Thanks for the belly laugh.
You obviously don't understand how revolutions *work*. They are the most *polarizing* social dynamic imaginable -- look at the U.S. Civil War, for example.
In such a social environment we won't be lazily poking keys on the keyboard to 'diss' a political adversary over the Internet, to put it lightly. Do you think that there will be a dedicated discussion board strictly for 'fencesitters' at such a time?
But, I guess more to-the-point, what would such claims-of-victimhood *amount* to, during the time of a world-revolutionary political situation?