- 30 Jul 2020 02:26
#15110513
Yeah yeah yeah. Great. So tell me why the gradualist approach worked with the transition from feudalism to capitalism.
ckaihatsu wrote:You're sounding like an echo of *all* past promotions of this scheme -- you seem to think that the overall capitalist economics would somehow become *different* just because *workers* would somehow be able to acquire the workplaces that they currently work *for*, as wage-slaves.
You sound like you're trying to *denigrate* and *degrade* the vanguardist violent-revolution-leading-to-seizure-of-power approach, when it's the vanguardist approach *only* that can adequately address the issue of how workers would *acquire* the means of mass industrial production / workplaces, in the first place.
The 'recipe for failure' is expecting capitalist economic dynamics to *behave differently* just because workers somehow manage to acquire ownership of their workplaces, on a localist basis. You sound like an anarchist / Frankfurt-School type with this line of yours.
Yeah yeah yeah. Great. So tell me why the gradualist approach worked with the transition from feudalism to capitalism.
Government is properly for people, and money is not a form of speech.