- 11 Oct 2020 15:47
#15126634
Actual criminal court stuff (or the conspicuous lack thereof) should be treated as at least warranting investigation. Historically, an unwillingness to do so sometimes comes back to bite the people who set the precedent.
Actual criminal court stuff (or the conspicuous lack thereof) should be treated as at least warranting investigation. Historically, an unwillingness to do so sometimes comes back to bite the people who set the precedent.
Lmao, I guarantee you no fund manager is driving an ETF based purely on spite. -- some guy out there actually believes this.