Judge Matthew William Brann spent years as a Republican Party official in Pennsylvania and was active in the Federalist Society and National Rifle Association
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR
PRESIDENT, INC., et al.,
KATHY BOOCKVAR, et al.,
NOVEMBER 21, 2020
Brann penned an opinion that could support sanctions of discipline against both the lawyers who filed the complaint [then withdrew] and the succeeding counsel who pressed frivolous claims in apparent violation of RPC 3.1.
A case that is “dismissed with prejudice” is completely and permanently over.
It's amusing really in a sick kind of way, when I recall a time when Liberals were concerned about computer hacking of elections, voter fraud on a mass scale, and election integrity. When it was a Republican who apparently won, most recently President Trump. I remember the dark insinuations of the Russians ''rigging the elections for Trump'', and now (but of course!) the 2020 election is suddenly the safest and most secure election in American history
I know that you specifically don't care about the integrity of the 2020 election, as long as President Trump is beaten, and I suspect most of the resident Liberals feel the same way.To be fair, if they are dishonest about it they probably are dishonest first of all admitting it even to themselves. After all, if the guy is dangerous, perhaps a fascist or something, a criminal-surely they understand elements of the government who never fully accepted his Presidency (especially if they were holdovers from the Clinton, Bush, and Obama years) would engage in and possibly carry out an election steal. And if they themselves meant the United States no good, even more so.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence which necessitates going before the highest court in the land, the US Supreme Court, for final resolution. Gaslighting and obfuscation of that fact is telling in itself, a fear that the results desired by Liberals are a mirage and can be legally overturned, that if these claims are true, some people could even go to jail.
If these claims are true and as this all goes forwards, I fully expect a campaign to discredit the US Supreme Court's conservative judges, an effort to ignore an unfavorable ruling, and rioting in the streets. A favorable ruling will be praised of course, but that is what all this bullshit denial of even the possibility of a stolen election is all about; to prepare the rank and file for an unfavorable ruling and denial of legitimacy of a second Trump administration; not that they conferred much legitimacy on him after 2016. If that's the case, I fully expect another impeachment attempt among other obstructive measures.
But man is a fickle and disreputable creature and perhaps, like a chess-player, is interested in the process of attaining his goal rather than the goal itself.