- 26 Nov 2020 21:38
#15139730
@ingliz and I have explained it.
Once more:
Neither the judges nor the executive violated state law in Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania had two relevant court cases: one about late ballots and one about signature verification.
The first one was ruled on by Alito. Since he is a judge, you would define his involvement as a violation of law if you were logically consistent. He ordered the late ballots segregated. They were segregated. The number of ballots segregated is less than the margin by which Biden won. So even if we assume that 100% of these ballots can be taken out of Biden’s total, Biden still wins.
The second court case was about signature verification. ingliz has provided links to the appropriate laws written by tye Pennsylvania legislature, and these laws do not say that signature verification is required. If you were being logically consistent, you would be denouncing Pennsylvania election executives for enforcing signature verification in earlier elections, since that would be a policy that the legislature did not set as law.
Do you have any questions?
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Doug64 wrote:@ingliz, you might want to add the point you’re trying to make with your links, maybe even some quotes, to explain how the judge- and executive-mandated violations of Pennsylvania state law weren’t actually violations of state law.
@ingliz and I have explained it.
Once more:
Neither the judges nor the executive violated state law in Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania had two relevant court cases: one about late ballots and one about signature verification.
The first one was ruled on by Alito. Since he is a judge, you would define his involvement as a violation of law if you were logically consistent. He ordered the late ballots segregated. They were segregated. The number of ballots segregated is less than the margin by which Biden won. So even if we assume that 100% of these ballots can be taken out of Biden’s total, Biden still wins.
The second court case was about signature verification. ingliz has provided links to the appropriate laws written by tye Pennsylvania legislature, and these laws do not say that signature verification is required. If you were being logically consistent, you would be denouncing Pennsylvania election executives for enforcing signature verification in earlier elections, since that would be a policy that the legislature did not set as law.
Do you have any questions?
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...