The Atlantean Conspiracy - Politics | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Theories and happenings too odd for the main forums.
By ericdubay
Hey everyone, I need your help spreading the word. My new book "The Atlantean Conspiracy" is availalble for FREE download with hundreds of color pictures at:

Did you know all 43 U.S. presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office? 34 have been genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne, the brutal eighth century King of the Franks. 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England. In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election. “The Atlantean Conspiracy” covers how world royalty through the Vatican and secret societies control literally every facet of our lives from behind the scenes and have done so for thousands of years. Sound unbelievable? You can't imagine how deep the rabbit-hole goes.

Table of Contents:

Presidential Bloodlines

The New World Order

Big Brother Surveillence Society

FEMA Concentration Camps

The Secret Society Network

The Free Masons

The Illuminati

Committee of 300

Skull and Bones

Bohemain Grove

The Federal Reserve

Round Table



Bilderberg Group

Trilateral Commission

False Flag Operations

Problem, Reaction, Solution

The Lusitania and WWI

Pearl Harbor and WWII

Operation Northwoods

Gulf of Tonkin and the Vietnam War

Oklahoma City Bombing


Media Manipulation

Forced Government Indoctrination Camps

The Health Conspiracy




Brotherhood Symbology

Illuminati Flame

Pyramid and All-Seeing Eye

The Dollar Bill

Sun and Stars

United States Incorporated

Schools, Courts, Churches and the Cult of Saturn

The Masonic Movie and Music Industries

Occult Numerology







9-11 Numerology & Symbology

Calendrical/Time Manipulation

Christopher Columbus and The New World

The Religious Conspiracy


Santa, Jesus, Mithra and the Magic Mushroom


The Moon Landing Hoax

Aliens & Demons

Order Out of Chaos

Please take a look and pass the link on to anyone and everyone you can! Thanks so much, peace

User avatar
By Potemkin
Did you know all 43 U.S. presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office? 34 have been genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne, the brutal eighth century King of the Franks. 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England.

About half the population of Britain are directly descended from Edward I. And let's not even talk about what percentage of the world's population were sired by Genghis Khan. Maybe the Mongols are behind it all? The Golden Horde are poised to sweep across the globe, raping and pillaging civilisation....
By ericdubay
Please download the book before they delete my thread. I've already been censored by this forum once. Supposedly they have this "Conspiracy Theory" forum, but when I come around some of the higher-ups here get antsy. That guy, for no reason said to delete this thread. What's up with this
By Spin
It's controlled by the Bilderbergs. They are using it to weed out dissent.

User avatar
By Prosthetic Conscience
I've already been censored by this forum once.

And so you've returned, breaking more rules? Naughty person. The Descendants of Charlemagne will have to teach you another lesson.

This constant churning of people makes it possible to apply Chang's analysis to the world as a whole. For example, almost everyone in the New World must be descended from English royalty—even people of predominantly African or Native American ancestry, because of the long history of intermarriage in the Americas. Similarly, everyone of European ancestry must descend from Muhammad. The line of descent for which records exist is through the daughter of the Emir of Seville, who is reported to have converted from Islam to Catholicism in about 1200. But many other, unrecorded descents must also exist.

Chang's model has even more dramatic implications. Because people are always migrating from continent to continent, networks of descent quickly interconnect. This means that the most recent common ancestor of all six billion people on earth today probably lived just a couple of thousand years ago. And not long before that the majority of the people on the planet were the direct ancestors of everyone alive today. Confucius, Nefertiti, and just about any other ancient historical figure who was even moderately prolific must today be counted among everyone's ancestors.

Toward the end of our conversation Humphrys pointed out something I hadn't considered. The same process works going forward in time; in essence every one of us who has children and whose line does not go extinct is suspended at the center of an immense genetic hourglass. Just as we are descended from most of the people alive on the planet a few thousand years ago, several thousand years hence each of us will be an ancestor of the entire human race—or of no one at all.

The dense interconnectedness of the human family might seem to take some of the thrill out of genealogical research. Sure, I was able to show in the Genealogical Office that my Siggins ancestors are descended from the fourteenth-century Syggens of County Wexford; but I'm also descended from most of the other people who lived in Ireland in the fourteenth century. Humphrys took issue with my disillusionment. It's true that everyone's roots go back to the same family tree, he said. But each path to our common past is different, and reconstructing that path, using whatever records are available, is its own reward. "You can ask whether everyone in the Western world is descended from Charlemagne, and the answer is yes, we're all descended from Charlemagne. But can you prove it? That's the game of genealogy."
By ericdubay
The New World Order conspiracy for unelected world government under the UN is not a theory. This is the reality our generation faces. Please read this:

One whistle-blowing Congressman was Larry P. McDonald, who was then killed onboard a plane suspiciously shot down by soviets. In 1976 he said, [i]“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

"There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” -Senator, Daniel K. Inouye, 1977

"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." -Mikhail Gorbachev, United Nations address, December, 1988

"The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward a historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times; a New World Order can emerge.” -President George Bush, Congressional speech, September 11, 1990

"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging New World Order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." -President George Bush, January 1991

"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council." -A. M. Rosenthal, New York Times, January, 1991

"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court." -George McGovern, New York Times, February, 1991

“What is at stake is more than one small country. It is a big idea, a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve universal aspirations of mankind— peace and security, freedom and the rule of law. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, a new world order, can emerge. Now we can see a new world coming into being, a world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order.” -President George Bush, State of the Union Address, September 11, 1991

"George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging. The vehicle to bring this about is the United Nations, the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American." -U.S. Ambassador David Funderburk, 1991

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” -Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine, July 20th, 1992

"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance." -George Bush, 1992

"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions." -Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 1994

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” -David Rockefeller at a UN Ambassadors’ dinner, Sept. 23rd, 1994

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." -Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs July/August 1995

"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification." -Brock Chisholm, while director of UN (WHO) World Health Organization

Just three days after the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, CFR member Gary Hart said on C-Span, “There is a chance for the president of the United States to use this disaster to carry out a phrase his father used…and that is a New World Order.”

In his 2002 Memoirs, David Rockefeller openly admitted conspiring with other globalists toward a one-world order: "Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Pope John Paul II stated at the World Day of Peace Homily on Jan. 1st, 2004 that, "People are becoming more and more aware of the need for a new international order.” In the Pope’s book called “The Keys of This Blood,” he wrote, “By the end of this decade we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations ... a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable."

With the success of Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” movie (which should be called “Convenient Half-Truths”) and a U.N. panel’s worth of poor science from the IPCC, the globalists are hoping to convince us that a world carbon-tax will save us from global warming. In 2007 British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said, “A New World Order is required to deal with the climate change crisis.” And in a book by Al Gore called “Earth in Balance,” he prophesizes a coming Global Marshall Plan to “help” the Earth and its people: “We are close to a time when all of humankind will envision a global agenda that encompasses a kind of Global Marshall Plan to address the causes of poverty and suffering and environmental destruction all over the Earth.”
User avatar
By Noelnada
A world governance is an absolute necessity. The sooner, the better.
User avatar
By Suska
why are all the nuts so attracted to the name Atlantis? Must be some kind of conspiracy such as the commie conspiracy to monopolize the color red, or the gay conspiracy to monopolize the rainbow.
By ericdubay
World governance is not "an absolute necessity." And why do you welcome it? United Nations officials are unelected. World government means top-down dictatorial style one-world president/king. What's to stop a Hitler from taking advantage of such power? There would be a world military (expansion of NATO) at their disposal to take care of "terrorists" and rouge nations.

In 1948 George Orwell wrote 1984, another quasi-fiction novel about the big brother control-grid surveillance societies to come. Orwell said, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.” On February 7th, 1950 FDR’s financial advisor, international banker James Paul Warburg stated before the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” Two days later on the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduced Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 stating that the United Nations Charter “should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.” In 1952, globalist and Committee of 300 member Bertrand Russell wrote “The Impact of Science on Society.” Russell, like Wells, wrote extensively about world government and the scientific dictatorships of the future:

“There is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire a feeling of unity are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or potential. It seems to that a world government could only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now inspires a nation at war.” -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (36)

“It is possible nowadays for a government to be very much more oppressive than any government could be before there was scientific technique. Propaganda makes persuasion easier for the government; public ownership of halls and paper makes counter-propaganda more difficult; and the effectiveness of modern armaments makes popular risings impossible. No revolution can succeed in a modern country unless it has the support of at least a considerable section of the armed forces. But the armed forces can be kept loyal by being given a higher standard of life than that of the average worker, and this is made easier by every step in the degradation of ordinary labour. Thus the very evils of the system help to give it stability. Apart from external pressure, there is no reason why such a regime should not last for a very long time." -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (61)

"A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government ... unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation ... Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed forces, it is clear that the level of civilization must decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible - that is until science is extinct." -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (117)

Shortly after Russell’s book, fellow Committee of 300 member Aldous Huxley wrote “Brave New World” about a future pharmacological scientific dictatorship in which the drugged citizens are described as “smiling depressives that love their servitude.” Aldous Huxley’s grandfather T.H. Huxley was another Committee of 300 member known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” because he rigorously defended evolution and advocated scientism. H.G. Wells knew both Huxley’s and considered T.H. to be his mentor. In 1959, Aldous Huxley gave one of his last public speeches called “The Final Revolution” at UC medical school, where he stated: “There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorships without tears, so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel – by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods; and this seems to be the final revolution.”

“The older dictators fell because they could never supply their subjects with enough bread, enough circuses, enough miracles, and mysteries. Under a scientific dictatorship, education will really work…most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.” -Aldous Huxley, “Brave New World Revisited”
User avatar
By Lazy Faire
Hey, I know this guy from the Protest Warrior forum! Making the rounds on all the big political forums, are we?
User avatar
By Prosthetic Conscience
why are all the nuts so attracted to the name Atlantis?

That's a good question. Just looking back in Wikipedia articles, for what they're worth, the modern claims about it seem to come from Charles-Étienne Brasseur de Bourbourg. Perhaps it was Schliemann's discovery of cities at Troy in the 1870s that really got a lot of people willing to say "see? there could be truth in these ancient Greek myths after all". In 1882 we get Ignatius L. Donnelly, an American politician, publishing Atlantis: The Antediluvian World. Drawing from him, you get Edgar Cayce, who draws in all the astrological and spirit woo-woo people, and Velikovsky, who establishes the 'I'm a brave fighter against the scientific establishment who won't let the truth be heard' meme for Atlantis.

There's a combination of 'ancient knowledge' (a few references in a very early bit of European literature from a generally respected philosopher), which gives it a bit of authority, with that anti-establishment aspect. And by going right back to Atlantis - said to exist before any written records - they have the chance to say "everything you've been told about history is a lie" (although that's a very Eurocentric attitude - I suspect claims about Atlantis are pretty rare in India or China). With conspiracies, the bigger, the better, if you want attention.

The idea of the downfall of an over-confident civilisation probably also appeals to anti-establishment types. Egypt, although often found in the conspiracy theories, doesn't have a satisfying catastrophe that serves as a warning to those who seek power. That was, of course, Plato's point in making up the story - that trying to rule an empire had ruined Athens.
By ericdubay
Yes I am making the rounds on political message boards. As I've said I need your help in distributing this book at the grassroots level. I understand all of your well warranted skepticism too. I probably would have told me to bugger off as well a few years ago. All I ask is that you take 10 minutes to download and skim through the book. Thanks so much.
User avatar
By Prosthetic Conscience
Honestly, Eric, that table of contents shows you have taken just about every kooky conspiracy theory doing the rounds on the internet (I'll give you credit for not touching chemtrails and HAARP) and stuck them in a 'book'. I can think of few bigger wastes of time. "Moon Landing Hoax"? Give us a break. There's no way that's going to be anything but an incoherent rant on how "they" are all out to get you.
By ericdubay
I understand it's difficult to swallow, but this is what's really going on in the world. I've put it all together into one free book, and all I ask is that you skim through. I didn't write about Chemtrails or HAARP but they are both real and dangerous. You say "give us a break" about the Moon landing hoax, and that's what I'm doing. I'm telling you the truth, NASA was created to lie to us and that's what it continues to do. We have never, and cannot, go to the Moon.
User avatar
By Oxymoron
Eric so by "writing a book" you can destroy all the secret organizations of the world?
By ericdubay
Writing a book cannot "destroy all the secret organizations of the world." It can, however, educate people from the pits of their government indoctrination and mainstream media trances. Most people aren't even aware that such secret organizations exist/exhibit the amount of influence they do. Why all the hostility and undue criticism folks? I'm offering you my free book, and if you're not interested, no need to belittle me or my project. Peace
User avatar
By Prosthetic Conscience
No, Eric, there is a need to belittle you and your project. By spreading lies about vaccines, AIDS and more, you're putting people's lives at risk. That's what conspiracy theory nutters never realise. You're a danger to society, if anyone is gullible enough to believe your crap. So but pointing out the absurdity of your paranoia, we're doing a public service.
User avatar
By Oxymoron
however, educate people from the pits of their government indoctrination and mainstream media trances.

And how do we know your not one of their agents?[…][…]

Alright, so if I say that I choose to not be the c[…]