Nationalism Paradox of Globalism - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Traditional 'common sense' values and duty to the state.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15149566
in the past Year I havent see any answers on some lets say crucial pivots in human history, the first one methane math [1][1] and the second one as reflex of consumerism [2] an potential epidemic math [3] in both cases events with prolonged risks of ww3 due to world economic meltdown as result of their nuseffects!

Now would like to point to other crucial reflex above or beneath all as idealism, i.e. Nationalism, that although is with bad genetics from cosmopolitan aspect > globalism , sure has potential for good from traditional aspect > conservative ideals that lead to population growth , and if something stands on the way of totalitarian new world order for sure that is Nationalism even do its paradox because the same is child of the utopian enlightenment globalism!


Cheers & Happy New Year ...

Admin Edit: Links to other Forums removed
#15149693
That is a mess.

So let me try to help..

State your thesis in 25 words or less.

Next. don't link to other forums, that is not going to help anybody.

You seem to be saying the world is going to hell in a handcart. That would be correct.
#15149694
in the above "hyper"thesis there are many inconsistencies, interestingly they provoke what-d questions, but as such they are not there to mislead or prove something but are simplified so there would be as less as possible smaller sceletone of the idea, eg. what was referred as national awakening in Russia in part 1 infact is not national but international, unlike ottoman empire where indeed it was national, yet the experiment of october revolution was more advanced although also from the same enlightenment kitchen of western determinists, its open question was this solely because fears or just russian soil was more easily controllable back then so they forced more advanced social experiment through which they hoped to engage their ww-I nwo agenda!? in the end if this was suggested in the proposed text it would derail the point to more broader angle, or eventually will make less efficient point about nationalism instantly shifting to globalism etc. SO DONT MIND for such hope obvious "mistakes"
#15149695
late wrote:That is a mess.
So let me try to help..
State your thesis in 25 words or less.
Next. don't link to other forums, that is not going to help anybody.
You seem to be saying the world is going to hell in a handcart. That would be correct.


... yes, I accept its mess, but its somehow research synopsis that needs to be build up more profoundly - as in its logic so as in its storytelling, I'll say its just a Pitch, tho instead in 25 words in 250 words, simply its hard to explain the idea > that Nationalism is wrong as it was poured, but in the end it would become as right as it will be ...

about other forum linking, it was not my intention to prove something but suggest either other variables, or to point that also elsewhere some points are shared, anyway I dont want to plagiarize some info, although think that crosslinking with forum like historum would not at all hurt this forum, simply it has strict moderation so it could help the debate here additionally, in a way why repeating same thing again and again, although I would say as such those links should be archived first on archive.is + archive.org and in that case there would be no empty thread flow in future, even I think like this should be linked all other links ...
#15149730
Odiseizam wrote:
... yes, I accept its mess, but its somehow research synopsis that needs to be build up more profoundly - as in its logic so as in its storytelling, I'll say its just a Pitch, tho instead in 25 words in 250 words, simply its hard to explain the idea > that Nationalism is wrong as it was poured, but in the end it would become as right as it will be ...

about other forum linking, it was not my intention to prove something but suggest either other variables, or to point that also elsewhere some points are shared, anyway I dont want to plagiarize some info, although think that crosslinking with forum like historum would not at all hurt this forum, simply it has strict moderation so it could help the debate here additionally, in a way why repeating same thing again and again, although I would say as such those links should be archived first on archive.is + archive.org and in that case there would be no empty thread flow in future, even I think like this should be linked all other links ...



I am not a Mod. The reason I don't want you to link to another forum is because it's confusing.

Now... are you proposing global government? I don't have a problem with that. But why didn't you say that in a 25 word summary? Being to organise your thoughts and express them succinctly is a good skill to have.
#15149736
@late no the point of this thread would be nationalism saves the day from the eugenic globalism, something that to some extent I have pointed in recent post on overpopulation ...

https://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&p=15149733#p15149733

about linking to other forum, think any confusion would be overcome if that is accepted as never ending story :) yet its just recent reflex from my past, tho it would happen again, simply I didnt see any such rule in the FAQ, and I see those external links as further references, but I dont mind if such discussion is not welcomed here, just cant imagine tomorrow how should I paraphrase someone from other e-forum and that not to be trowed at me as plagiarism!?
#15149751
Odiseizam wrote:
@late no the point of this thread would be nationalism saves the day from the eugenic globalism, something that to some extent I have pointed in recent post on overpopulation ...

https://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&p=15149733#p15149733

about linking to other forum, think any confusion would be overcome if that is accepted as never ending story :) yet its just recent reflex from my past, tho it would happen again, simply I didnt see any such rule in the FAQ, and I see those external links as further references, but I dont mind if such discussion is not welcomed here, just cant imagine tomorrow how should I paraphrase someone from other e-forum and that not to be trowed at me as plagiarism!?



Quote it, post a link.

Global problems demand global solutions.
#15149759
bre typo, it wouldnt happen again > other forums linking, although I still think in many cases that would be wrong!

late wrote:Quote it, post a link.

Global problems demand global solutions.


hm, why to quote if there is archived link, just piling extra text its not useful, think that "less is more" hit the bell in this case ...

about global problems, yes eugenics and western dominionism is indeed global problem :)
#15149893
think what sparks confusion among many people is the trend of ideological bipolar generalization between nationalism and globalism, what I think is just agitprop mirage because infact there are different types of globalism eg. Neocon Globalism vs International Globalism etc. so sorry if my topic title here is also out of sync, but essentially I am referring to the enlightenment ideals of Brotherhood and Equality thus logically the socialistic nwo globalization!

hm, must acknowledge all this even as terminology is too messy for essaying eg. the true origin of the word globalism comes as post-ww2 western dominionist strive for compactness of the western realm [1] thus we could say there is semantic misunderstanding and misuse of this term, which nowadays is mostly used for marking of any nwo agenda of the international socialists, that as such was in motion since the enlightenment era onward, yet in the beginning in its first phase strive for overthrowing royalism through republicanism > that in its far-left corner became socialism and as centralized federal evolved in communism , while in its esoterical (freemasonic) far-right became nationalism and as centralized eg. is evolving in unionism tho still not matured in full blown western-united-nations for what first eu need to become federal so it could merge later with usA and Canada!

have in mind the freemasonic goals mids enlightenment national movement and how/why has spread in royal europe and america [1] first in uK [2] then UsA [2] and after France [2] as such indeed points to greater nwo scheme, which somehow it could be rooted through the baconian "new atlantis" so it wouldnt be at all wrong to mark such nwo as atlantism, now were atlantic experiments also the bolshevik-communism and nazi-socialism, hm that is really tempting to speculate i.e. all clues in this case also leads to freemasonry, all in all this kind of globalism needs to have specific mark eg. as proposed atlantism!?
What you saying Hammond....

Also nobody knows the danger of mass borrowing ye[…]

So whats the point of middle management? To de[…]

Hollywood films are inaccurate generally , when d[…]

US bombs Syria

Please...please...please Biden don't be a war hun[…]