- 08 Mar 2021 10:00
#15160025
Trigger warning - This post may contain mixed metaphors.
This is a clear line in the sand between the racists and the anti racists and between the sexist chauvinist pigs ( as they used to called back in the day) and the anti sexists. This is not 1952. Britain has changed. It is a multi racial society and if we must keep the monarchy, then the monarchy must represent the changing society of Britain and Britain's changing relationship with its ex empire.
I have argued against the bulldozing of Southern American culture. I have argued that so called White Dixie folk have nothing, absolutely nothing to feel ashamed about their ancestors past. But I have never argued that the descendants of slaves should bow and curtsy to the descendants of their massas' and missees. And that is exactly what the establishment faction are arguing in this case. They are arguing that so called Black men, men of South Asian heritage, men with heritage from the Raj should bow to King Charles and his eldest son King William. That even if / when a so called Black man or a Black woman were to become Prime Minister, that they should have to bow and scrape their way across the floor to kiss the hand of Charles, the very epitome of a cry-baby, self entitled, whing, loathsome, hypocritical, self entitled, privileged White man.
I have been called a racist because I refused to jump aboard the "Black Lies matter" band wagon. I opposed the demos in British towns and cities. What in Gods name this policing incident in a "Black" led police department in a Democratic run city in a far away country had to with us was quite beyond me. But I have to call it this how I see it. If you think that the above is acceptable, than I can't see anyway other than to define you as a racist. And if you are of so called Black or Brown skin yourself, then I have to say that you have bought into "White supremacist" ideology. Because if anything Prince William is worse than Charles, with his condescending, I understand your pain psycho babble. If anything the insult and humiliation with Prince William would be greater.
I was not blind to Donald Trump's privilege, his repulsive coarseness and his character floors, but that didn't stop me backing him against Neo-Con Hilary. In a similar way, Meghan may have privilege, she may not be a perfected Bodhisattva of a human being, but I have no trouble sympathising with her desire not have to curtsey to Queen Katie down the road. The Firm were absolutely determined that she wasn't going to outshine Kate for long. They were absolutely determined to take her down a peg or two. And whether the individual members of the Firm's dominant faction harboured racist feelings themselves is irrelevant. They were absolutely willing to work and collude with opinion formers and currents within British and international society who were. What they wanted was a continuation "White supremacist" monarchy, with some obedient, Aunt Tomasina light brown windrow dressing.
And my final point, what about Camilla. She's worse than Waity Katy, for being an obedient bitch. Camilla and Kate for Queens are an insult to every modern minded woman. They would be spitting in the face of every feminist in Britain and the wider commonwealth. I don't have daughters, bur if I did for all her faults I would consider Meghan a million miles better as a role model for them than Camilla or Kate.
Hence I have no hesitation in demanding that when Queen Elizabeth II dies the succession should pass to Harry and Meghan as joint and equal monarchs, in the tradition of William and Mary and Ferdinand and Isabela.
Progressives lie scattered on Woke's highway, Diverse ghosts crowd the young child's fragile eggshell mind.