- 06 Jul 2023 17:13
#15279244
If people want to inform themselves, here's some links.
Victoria Nuland get's caught talking about how the coup regime in Ukraine should look like, before it had actually happened:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
Obama points out that you cannot win a war against Russia in Ukraine, because it's a national interest to them - that means they see this issue as a threat to their existence - and because they have escalatory dominance.
https://www.theatlantic.com/press-relea ... ns/473151/
This means there is no way to win the war, because Russia is a nuclear superpower. If we managed to win against Russia in a conventional war - we are thankfully far from this ability - they would by their nuclear doctrine use nuclear weapons.
Zulushny (leader of the ukrainian military) interview in New Economist
https://www.newgeopolitics.org/2022/12/ ... be-killed/
And that's just the first thing he says. Already completely opposite to western propaganda, which acts as if Putin woke up someday and for no reason, after not starting any war of aggression ever before, decided to conquer Ukraine. The article is full of other interesting information, too. Towards the end for example Zulushny says how many weapons he would need for an invasion. But over half a year later he still didn't get that many weapons from the west.
There's a lot more that's interesting, including a lot of stuff that far predates the conflict and explains why Nazis in Ukraine are so powerful, though that stuff probably can't be found online (I only heard from Scott Ritter about that), but these are the three links I would deem the most important.
Victoria Nuland get's caught talking about how the coup regime in Ukraine should look like, before it had actually happened:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
Obama points out that you cannot win a war against Russia in Ukraine, because it's a national interest to them - that means they see this issue as a threat to their existence - and because they have escalatory dominance.
https://www.theatlantic.com/press-relea ... ns/473151/
Obama declares Ukraine to be not a core American interest and that he is reluctant to intervene in the country, because Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there. “The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do.”—President Obama
This means there is no way to win the war, because Russia is a nuclear superpower. If we managed to win against Russia in a conventional war - we are thankfully far from this ability - they would by their nuclear doctrine use nuclear weapons.
Zulushny (leader of the ukrainian military) interview in New Economist
https://www.newgeopolitics.org/2022/12/ ... be-killed/
For us, for the military, the war began in 2014.
And that's just the first thing he says. Already completely opposite to western propaganda, which acts as if Putin woke up someday and for no reason, after not starting any war of aggression ever before, decided to conquer Ukraine. The article is full of other interesting information, too. Towards the end for example Zulushny says how many weapons he would need for an invasion. But over half a year later he still didn't get that many weapons from the west.
There's a lot more that's interesting, including a lot of stuff that far predates the conflict and explains why Nazis in Ukraine are so powerful, though that stuff probably can't be found online (I only heard from Scott Ritter about that), but these are the three links I would deem the most important.
There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning. - Warren Buffett