- 31 Oct 2023 00:27
#15293582
No.
Cis is not ideological. It is a medical term.
And even if it were an ideological term, that would not make it pejorative.
So you have no evidence that the term is pejorative.
I explicitly deny the claim that only trans women can be women.
If you again claim that I support that, yiu will be deliberately misleading people.
Provide evidence that the oerson who coined cis was trying “to normalize …. ideological vocabulary [to] redefine the words for the feelings of … cultists”
Your loaded question is insulting. Rephrase it politley and I will answer it.
Note that here you are justifying an infringement of freedom of speech.
You are therefore implicitly agreeing that it is not progreesives who are restricting free speech, and that instead it is transphobic legislators.
https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/ ... ights-code
This is why the Saskatchewan government is invoking the notwithstanding clause.
Because that isnthe onky kegal way for a provincial government to sidestep human rights violations.
You have never been able to show a single lie I have supposedly made.
And you will not do so now. Yiur accusations are unfounded.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Godstud wrote:@Pants-of-dog The term cis is ideologue dialogue and is therefore offensive even if you are too dishonest to admit that.
No.
Cis is not ideological. It is a medical term.
And even if it were an ideological term, that would not make it pejorative.
So you have no evidence that the term is pejorative.
Women are not women to ideologues like you. They have to be ciswomen because only Transwomen can be women. This is according to the ideology that YOU are pushing, as an activist! Your ideology is built on lies and you perpetuate it with more lies!
I explicitly deny the claim that only trans women can be women.
If you again claim that I support that, yiu will be deliberately misleading people.
An adult human female is a woman, and not a ciswoman. An adult human male is a man and not a cisman. These are already defined. This is merely done to try to normalize your ideological vocabulary so that you can redefine the words for the feelings of your cultists.
Provide evidence that the oerson who coined cis was trying “to normalize …. ideological vocabulary [to] redefine the words for the feelings of … cultists”
To normal people that isn't a problem. Why do we need to cater to delusion? YOu still haven't answered that, as usual. You never like to actually answer questions, you just sidestep.
Your loaded question is insulting. Rephrase it politley and I will answer it.
Note that here you are justifying an infringement of freedom of speech.
You are therefore implicitly agreeing that it is not progreesives who are restricting free speech, and that instead it is transphobic legislators.
Incidentally:
The Saskatchewan government passed Bill 137 Friday, which makes parental consent required before a child under 16 can use a different gender-related name or pronoun at school.
This means that the parents have to be involved, unlike recent incidents where these things were kept from parents by dishonest ideologue teachers. It can be done only with parental consent, but that's a problem to your ideology because that makes grooming them harder. Parents who actually care about the children might interfere.
https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/ ... ights-code
Saskatchewan’s Advocate for Children and Youth is concerned the provincial government’s proposed preferred pronoun policy in schools could potentially violate the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code.
Gender identity “is a prohibited ground of discrimination under provincial human rights legislation, and the education system has a duty to accommodate the needs of transgender and gender diverse students,” Lisa Broda, provincial advocate for children and youth, said in a press release Friday that accompanied a 41-page review.
This is why the Saskatchewan government is invoking the notwithstanding clause.
Because that isnthe onky kegal way for a provincial government to sidestep human rights violations.
You do that by perpetuating your cult, thru your blind and reckless activism. You spread lies.
You have never been able to show a single lie I have supposedly made.
And you will not do so now. Yiur accusations are unfounded.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...