- 22 Mar 2024 06:00
#15308554
I was watching this Law & Order episode about a mentally challenged teen girl who was supposedly taken advantage of by a group of boys, and I noticed all the females bitching in the comments, moaning about how unfair it was the judge overturned the jury's verdict to find the boys guilty.
If I were the judge, that would have totally been me!
Correct decision, in my view.
Some will try to argue that she couldn't really provide full informed "consent".
So a mentally handicapped teenage girl can never have sex with anyone?
If they thought it was so important to protect her, why not send her to an all girls school? You send her to a mixed gender high school, what did they expect was going to happen?
I was watching this Law & Order episode about a mentally challenged teen girl who was supposedly taken advantage of by a group of boys, and I noticed all the females bitching in the comments, moaning about how unfair it was the judge overturned the jury's verdict to find the boys guilty.
If I were the judge, that would have totally been me!
Correct decision, in my view.
Some will try to argue that she couldn't really provide full informed "consent".
So a mentally handicapped teenage girl can never have sex with anyone?
If they thought it was so important to protect her, why not send her to an all girls school? You send her to a mixed gender high school, what did they expect was going to happen?