The Black Eagle is more accomplished and polished in every single way
Where do you get this information?
And how is a MBT more accomplished when it has never seen open warfare when compared to a MBT which HAS seen open warfare in two invasions?
Look, I am not saying that the black eagle doesnt have the potential to be the best ... what I am saying is that its not proven. Hell, its not even tried!
And what do you mean how can I argue that?
The M-1 Abrams which is a rather old tank these days is indeed battle tested. The black eagle which is still a prototype tanks is not ...
Unless you know of some war that the black eagle has been involved in that I dont know about?
And its not cheap! Its about 3x the price of the new T variety tank ...
So far all anyone can do is act like a fanboi of this tank ... no one is using logic ... no ones using facts.
Everything that is a selling point for the black eagle is based on the manufacturers word on it ...
I bet those who make the Stryker can convince you the Stryker is the greatest thing to join the modern battlefield ... but stick on the modern battlefield and find out the truth ...
The story ends, it just ends.