Farmer, Scout leader and bank manager filmed abuse on children as young as nine and held sex parties in isolated farmhouse
Married Scout leader with HIV had sex with child in the back of a Jeep
HSBC bank manager turned up at a London hotel with condoms and lube to have sex with a 10-year-old
Ex-farmer circulated pictures of bestiality
Soldier in the Household Cavalry to be sentenced next month after raping schoolgirl
By Daily Mail Reporter
PUBLISHED: 21:30, 23 September 2012 | UPDATED: 22:52, 23 September 2012
A nationwide paedophile ring, including a Scout leader, a bank manager and a retired sheep farmer, have been jailed indefinitely for a string of shocking sex crimes against young children.
Girls as young as nine were filmed being abused and shared among the twisted the individuals.
The gang were also linked to an isolated country farmhouse, owned by ex-farmer Nicholas Cordery, where group sex parties and bestiality took place.
A court heard on Friday that Cordery's friend Lance Corporal Simon Davies, 37, of the Household Cavalry, told him that he had cunningly groomed a young schoolgirl for sex.
Davies - who will be sentenced at court next month - recorded the rape on camera and sent the shocking video to 63-year-old Cordery, who forwarded it onto 22 different contacts online.
In return Cordery sent sickening images back to the soldier of another girl, aged 12 years, being raped by a man, Reading Crown Court heard.
Davies also arranged for HIV sufferer Peter Malpas, 47, to sexually assault a girl in the back of his Jeep, prosecutor Christopher Donnellan QC said.
He was behind the wheel as Scout leader Malpas sat in the back of the vehicle and sexually assaulted the child.
After the ordeal, Davies told the innocent girl: 'He is a nice man.'
Davies’s teaching assistant wife, Fiona Parsons-Davies, 45, of Windsor, admitted cruelty by not reporting it — and got three years.
Judge Stephen John told her: 'A single action could have brought the abuse to an end.'
Another gang member, Anthony Flack had arranged to meet a man and his daughter, 10, for sex in a London hotel.
The 54-year-old HSBC bank manager had condoms, lubricant and a camera on him, the judge was told. But he was arrested when an undercover police officer met him instead.
Cordery admitted two counts of conspiring to rape children aged under 13 years. He also admitted making 1,191 indecent images of children, distributing indecent images and two counts of possessing 185 extreme pornographic images.
When officers raided his wooden chalet they found sex toys, pornography, a battered looking teddy bear and a pair of Hello Kitty knickers left next to a butter dish.
Cordery had also sent a picture of a bestiality act to Davies, to which the squaddie replied: 'Thanks for the pic - I'm totally unshockable, bi and love taboo sex.
'I'm into younger and little girls are my fave. Animal sex, dog, pig, horse and goat - I'd love to be filmed with a K9.'
Flack admitted conspiracy to rape a child under 13 years. He admitted 11 counts making indecent images and one of possessing 290 movies of extreme pornography and 51 images. He also admitted arranging or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence.
Malpas pleaded guilty to assault of a child by penetration and sexual touching of a girl under 13 years. He also admitted possessing 88 movies and 697 indecent images of children, making 98 images and one count of distributing indecent photographs of children, between March 6, last year, and January 18.
When officers arrested him at his home in January, he told them frankly: 'Something terrible has happened. I am evil.
'I can't believe what I have done. I have ruined that poor girl's life and I have ruined my family's lives.'
Parsons-Davies admitted one count of cruelty to a child, an offence which happened between January 27 and August 28, last year.
At sentencing, Judge Stephen John said: 'Two central figures were at the heart of the enterprise.
'The first was Simon Davies, who is to be sentenced at a later date, who repeatedly raped a nine-year-old girl, distributed images of his rape and offered her for further rape directly through Cordery, including to Flack and Malpas.
'The second was Cordery, living in a secluded farm and providing facilities there for sexual activity involving offences with animals and children.
'One of the victims was nine at the relevant time. The physical and particularly psychological consequences are difficult to imagine.'
Cordery of Murcott, near Malmesbury, Wiltshire, was jailed for 11 years in an indeterminate sentence for the protection of the public. He will serve a minimum of five-and-a-half years before he will be considered for release by a parole board.
Flack, of Windrush Road, Keynsham, Bristol, was jailed for 10 years in an indeterminate sentence for the protection of the public. He will serve at least five years.
Malpas of Moulton, Northampton, was jailed for a total of 11-and-half-years for the protection of the public. He will serve at least five years and nine months.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z27OYbynH9
The Pakistani gang who had sex with red-light working homeless girls (aged 12/13 +) were jailed for (I think 15-30 years each. (Could be wrong, so please correct me) - Racism or what?
Possibly, but more likely a response to public outcry that was fuelled by racist attitudes and a racist media.
Very true, thats more likely the case.
It might be more to do with class than race. Rich people can afford better lawyers, we live in a nation where justice is for sale.
Bring back the death penalty. Why are we paying to keep these people in existence?
At the risk of sounding like I'm defending the Catholics, which I'm not, I honestly think they were the tip of the ice berg. One of the big problems with the law in these cases is that there was often a general understanding that you didn't bring this kind of thing up. A certain rough justice may even have been understood to have happened in exceptional cases, but a generation ago you didn't talk about this kind of thing.
According to the cs monitor, Protestant Churches are the most costly to insure in regard to child abuse, because it happens more.
We all sort of knew the boyscout leaders were suspect, even of we never said anything, and we still suspect other organizations of being guilty. In short, we don't talk about it enough.
I would guess a lot of organizations have been covering up for generations. The sooner they're rooted out the better, but I won't hold my breath for that to happen.
Alis Volat Propriis; Tiocfaidh ár lá; Proletarier Aller Länder, Vereinigt Euch!
I don't see what the problem is here. Clearly those girls were asking for it. After all, they kept going back for more. If it was young boys being "raped" by women, they would probably get an unofficial pat on the back. What is the deal with this ridiculous double standard? I thought girls have "sexual agency" just like boys do.
There is a stark difference between adolescent males of a teenage demographic fornicating with older women and older males sexually abusing pre-pubescent children - little girls. A very stark difference.
Anyway, I say hang 'em high.
"I am never guided by a possible assessment of my work" - President Vladimir Putin
"Nations whose nationalism is destroyed are subject to ruin." - Muammar Qaddafi
Draw, quarter them.
"Yes, indeed, many will be damned; few will be saved."
Saint Benedict Joseph Labre
Brother of Karl wrote:
Are you being serious?
If we are concerned about discrimination the solution is to give the death penalty for such people. This way no one can complain about discrimination for different jail sentences.
Against liberalism (1st position), against socialism (2nd position) and against fascism (3rd position) but with mankind (4th position).
In life there are only two directions, forward and backward.
Life is not a hotel.
Captain Sam wrote:
It is the reality of things.
Young boys having sex with female adults get a cheer.
Male adults having sex with young girls get death wishes.
When has that happened? I am pretty sure that in all the instances where women have done this to young boys, they went to jail.
You don't see a difference between 15 year old boys having sex with 35 year old women, and 40 year old men raping 9 year old girls? What the fuck is wrong with you?
Captain Sam wrote:
What the fuck is wrong with you by putting them words in my mouth? And what the fuck is wrong with you by labelling 1 example as "having sex", and the other as "rape"?
All I said is that in reality what gender the victem and the accused/criminal have plays a big roll. You're helping me prove that! I don't got figures. This is just my gut feeling of what I recall. I think morally and legally there simply should not be any gender discrimination when it is about sex between adults having sex with young childeren. Get it?
FYI: I see a slight difference between a victem being 15 and a victem being 9. But its negligible. While it is absolutely irrelevant that one criminal is 35 while the other is 40.
You don't see any difference between a sexually active teenager, and a tiny pre-pubscent girl?
Rei Murasame wrote:
Going to jail is one thing. Serving the same sentence is completely different.
female drugging and raping a 13 year old boy over 200 times:
sentenced to just 29 months
Thats a slap on the wrist. Cmon.
there is no difference legally.
You're acting absultely irrational. I'm condemning both cases, both cases equally.
A person so high that he is about to OD could even spot that.
excuse me? You are opening the gates for all adults to go rape any kid that is sexual active. Your morals are advocating pedophilia and not mine. I suggest you read this like 10 times to let it sink in.
Last edited by Thunderhawk on Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: removed content that was a rule violation
There's no difference between consensual sex between two sexually developed individuals and an adult raping a pre-pubescent child?
There are some serious ethical issues with an adult having sex with a teenager, but it's nowhere near as bad as someone raping a child.
No you're not, you're apologizing for pedophilia.
No I'm not. I'm pointing out that there's a big fucking difference between two sexually developed individuals having consensual sex, and an adult raping a small child.
Captain Sam wrote:
Yes I am.
WTF is wrong with you?
You don't get to veto what I am condemning.
Captain Sam wrote:
What you are calling "consensual sex" between childeren and adults still is rape. You are a supporter of pedophilia because of this. That a child is sexually developed is absolutely irrelevant. Its the age what counts. And 15 = child.
You are way past the slippery slope on this. Really. What is next? "Yeah the kid was as good as sexually develloped your honour", "Well if you look it from this angle than you could see the kid has some sexual devellopment. Its like a cup A. Lots of women got that". "I spotted at least 1 pubic hair, so no biggy now is it?"
Really.. wtf is wrong with you Sam? You got a relationship with a 15 year old or what?