blackjack21 wrote:I don't know what you mean here. Are you saying that media outlets are right wing shooters? I don't see any evidence for that.
I meant sympathize, this isn't the first time they been know to sympathize violence against minorities and those left wing thinking. Fox News/NRA supported the bombing of California by North Korea cause California had the free thought of having different opinions.
blackjack21 wrote:Slandering someone involves saying something about them that isn't true.
Which you describe the media, and I with Fox with one example. Slander also means to speak ill of, not just lies. It can define both or one.
blackjack21 wrote: It was created by Trayvon Martin himself.
Same with the Dylan burning the american flag, I never heard right wingers call him traitor.
blackjack21 wrote:I don't remember that. I thought pretty much everyone condemned him.
I never said that. I said they tried to downplayed his terrorism by putting out the usual dribble "he had health issues, he had good grades, he was nice etc". This is a pattern for many white shooters, like how the one shooter in texas in I think June was had the usual victim narrative cause he was bullied. Same with the parkland shooter.
blackjack21 wrote:Well there aren't nearly as many conservative murderers, but the media certainly does call them murderers if they commit murder.
Majority of terrorist attacks are conservative, if you count Islamists(whose views of women are similar to yours) it's greater. The media isn't left. They're more likely to call out the politics of the terrorist in the addition to his skin as you can see.
blackjack21 wrote:The police will try to make him feel comfortable so that he talks.
The Mcdonalds thing had nothing to do with "comfortable so that he talks". They just treated him just cause. If this is the case, DC sniper, parkland shooter, plenty of gang members young ones are owe a meal to get them talk.
blackjack21 wrote: Everything he said was used against him in a court of law.
They would have gotten that without the Mcdonalds. They should have treated him like how any young Black person would have, they would probably gotten more. Having a meal isn't doesn't sway a person in court of law. In fact his browser history and the fact he burn a american flag while waving the Boer flag is evidence against him.\\
blackjack21 wrote:Everything I've read suggested he was a violent criminal with a violent past and on parole--keep in mind our very liberal governor, Jerry Brown (a.k.a. "moonbeam") is trying to reduce the prison population to save money (because corrections workers unions demand a boat load of money).
That and because minorities are wrongful jail for owning drugs, the corrections unions had nothing to do with it. I see the agenda, you're in favor vast incarceration of minorities(your earlier post about wanting to buy stocks in prison). I don't see why say that, libertarians are against unions. This idea of accusing him of doing it for being cheap is just another form of slander.
blackjack21 wrote:They also don't want to address drugs that much, since people on drugs tend to vote for Democrats.
I don't know why keep falling this again. You know that's not true, nor is there a stats on it.
blackjack21 wrote:Can you stick to the topic, or create a thread on race where I will be happy to debate you as much as you like?
See now you're accusing me.