SSDR wrote:Capitalism is when things are made for capital, another term for that is profit.
No, you are again just redefining words to vacate them of meaning. Capitalism, like socialism, is defined specifically by OWNERSHIP of the means of production: natural resources (land) and capital goods.
A capitalist state monopoly is capitalism.
No, it most certainly and indisputably is not.
The Soviet Union was full of non socialists because their households conditioned them to be capitalists.
False. They became non-socialists because they experienced first-hand the evil of socialism.
They were conditioned under non socialist context without fully understanding that they are conditioning themselves and their families to be capitalists.
You are effectively claiming to be the recipient of divine revelation not available to other mortals who have all been "conditioned," while you somehow haven't. It's just absurd, disingenuous garbage.
Non socialist people abuse a socialist economy, thus ruining everything, and they call that an experience of "socialism" which is false because it is a spiral trap.
Wrong again. Honest, intelligent, psychologically healthy human beings undermine socialism because socialism is evil, anti-human filth.
Capitalists live in a socialist economy. Capitalists abuse socialism because they're capitalists. Capitalists experience bad socialist economy because of the capitalists' self destructive actions. Capitalists ruin their product of socialism that they had. Capitalist people destroy socialist economy, blaming "socialism" rather than the capitalists' self destructive actions such as corruption.
Wrong again. It is not capitalism that is self-destructive but socialism, because it tries to force people to give up their humanity and consequently forces them to corrupt the evil socialist system in order to survive.
That is an insult.
I can understand why you would perceive it as such.
Socialists appear to be ignorant to you because they don't match your mindset.
No, because they refuse to know self-evident and indisputable facts of objective physical reality.
Socialists appear to be stupid to you because you do not understand socialism.
No, because THEY obviously do not understand it.
And socialists have to be dishonest in a capitalist or a non socialist economy to save themselves from economic issues.
They have to be even more dishonest in a socialist economy just to survive.
Losing a job for being a socialist.
I wouldn't hire a socialist. They are too ignorant, stupid and dishonest to make productive workers, and will reliably bankrupt and destroy any employer that hires them.
Getting harassed for being a socialist.
Or getting personal property vandalized for being a socialist are some examples.
Some people do get carried away when they see an enemy of liberty, justice and truth.
Integrity can put yourself in danger and in 'harm's way.'
Especially in a socialist economy.
One who does not want their hearts to be liberated from false consciousness has to view reality as a joke because that is used to control them.
Thank you for agreeing that you have been comprehensively and conclusively refuted, you know it, and you have no answers.
...except when it ends up warming the Earth to the degree that it causes climate changes which in turn has negative impacts.
Nope. Wrong. Any change for the better, no matter how positive in net effects, is going to have some
negative impacts. E.g., even a cure for spinal cord injuries would have negative impacts on wheelchair manufacturers. Even if CO2 from burning fossil fuels were capable of causing significant warming of global climate (it isn't), the net effect would still be positive because of the effect on plant growth and increased rainfall. That's why periods of warm global climate were called, "optimums" before that term was ruled politically incorrect.