I do not think that any nation is hopeless to change; however, I think that some nations do require a lot more effort than others to become changed. - Verv
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Finfinder wrote:I'll take some of that action, and you said in your post why she won't destroy Trump. It's real simple people don't want their taxes raised.
JohnRawls wrote:As i said, it is a redistribution program so the taxes will be shouldered by the Corporations and the top 1%. Middle class won't be taxed as i understand. That is the whole point of redistribution.
That is a falsehood she can not account for the spending she proposes. The math doesn't work and she refuses to explain it.
late wrote:A country like England spends about half what we do with similar life expectancy.
The transition will be difficult, it always is for any major program. But the deal is the same as Obamacare, the people that were screaming against it started screaming to keep it after they've gotten regular health care.
You're complaining about a problem with politics, that most people can't, or won't, take the time to study policy proposals.
Finfinder wrote:Do you think Warren can "destroy Trump" in an election if she is anti corporations.
Do you actually believe she won't be on the take (from the corporations)?
BTW who actually likes taxes?
Rancid wrote:No, no, and no one. However for the third one, people understand that it's a necessary evil.
Ultimately, the government is really just an insurance company backed by an army. Some level of premiums have to be paid into the insurance company.
Rancid wrote:Yea, no shit. Reality/reason doesn't matter with campaigns, this is well understood.
Finfinder wrote:It makes no sense the plan is to impeach Trump at the expense of not winning the presidency and losing the majority in the house.
Zionist Nationalist wrote:She is going against the top 1%,Powerful corporations,Military lobby
Good luck with that
My guess is that Democrats will bite their lips and will nominate senile Joe
this will decrease their chances of winning but money speaks louder
Rancid wrote:Impeach or no impeach, the democrats aren't winning.
From a political sense, it's probably likely a bad move. Perhaps they are actually acting on some sort of principle, which is why I'm fine with them moving forward with it. Not like I give a shit about either party.
The notion that using fossil fuels could "ge[…]
It’s the qualifications that are an issue. These […]
I'm just saying that as the poverty grows in forme[…]
Roger Stone first told one of Donald Trump’s top […]