- 22 Jan 2020 15:08
#15060918
My position isn't "no pets" as I've stated. My problem was that it seemed like a lot of the "pet defenders" seem to downplay/deny that there is in fact a significant carbon footprint (and general plastic waste problem) associated with pet ownership. If pofoers can acknowledge that undeniable fact, I'm satisfied.
Pants-of-dog wrote:The “no pets” side is doomed to failure.
My position isn't "no pets" as I've stated. My problem was that it seemed like a lot of the "pet defenders" seem to downplay/deny that there is in fact a significant carbon footprint (and general plastic waste problem) associated with pet ownership. If pofoers can acknowledge that undeniable fact, I'm satisfied.
I can think of 11780 reasons Trump shouldn't be president ever again.