I'm sorry if all this jumping around is confusing, but I see nobody looks at old posts, so I'm moving my edit over here:
myowndrummer wrote:
Quote:
Just another Israel Attacks the hand that feeds it conspiracy...
Lavon Affair
USS Liberty
JFK
9/11
Food Tax
1.
The Lavon affairThis is the only false flag operation indeed carried out by Israeli operatives. However, as seen from the following article, operation "Susannah" was not a decision made by the Israeli government, rather by God knows whom.
Quote:
Sharrett commissioned a board of inquiry consisting of Israeli Supreme Court Justice Isaac Olshan and the first chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, Yaakov Dori that was unable to find conclusive evidence that Lavon had authorized the operation. Lavon tried to fix the blame on Shimon Peres, who was the secretary general of the defense ministry, and Glibi for insubordination and criminal negligence. Sharett resolved the dilemma by siding with Peres, after which Lavon resigned...
Ben-Gurion scheduled closed hearings with a new board of inquiry chaired by Chaim Cohen, a supreme court justice.
This inquiry found that the perjury indeed had been committed, and that Lavon had not authorized the operation.
2.
USS Liberty attackI have set up links time and again to various US declarations concerning the attack on USS Liberty, each proving definetly that no false-flag operation took place. Here's another one.
Quote:
New documents released by the State Department relating to the period of the 1967 Six Day War include CIA memos that say Israel did not know it was striking an American vessel when it attacked the USS Liberty off the coast of the Gaza Strip on June 8, 1967, killing 34 American sailors and injuring 172. The memos say the attack was carried out "by mistake, representing gross negligence."
Along with the release of the documents, the historian for the top-secret National Security Agency said Monday he believed available evidence "strongly suggested" Israel did not know it was bombarding an American ship...
Historians said the new documentation included little new on the Liberty incident itself. It is still not known, for example, why the USS Liberty, an intelligence-gathering ship, was allowed to linger so close to the war zone, or why Israel was not informed of its presence in the area...
The most significant documents, transcripts of tapes of communications between an Israeli air controller and helicopter pilots sent to rescue the wounded from the attack, were released last July.
Those intercepts showed that the Israeli rescue pilots first identified the ship as Egyptian and gradually realized, after spotting a US flag, that the ship was American.
"A CIA memo of June 13 reported they had no intercepts from the attacking planes and torpedo boats, but that the helicopter pilots' communication left little doubt that the Israelis had failed to identify the Liberty as a US ship," said Harriet Schwar, editor of the newly released volume.
"A follow-up CIA memo on June 21st noted that the Liberty had been identified prior to the attacks but concluded that the Israelis were not aware at the time of the attack that they were attacking a US ship. It concluded that the attack was not made in malice, but was by mistake, representing gross negligence. The Defense Intelligence Agency reached a similar conclusion," Schwar added.
David Hatch, the National Security Agency Historian, said of the intercepted communications of the rescue pilots: "While falling short of proof, the intercepts to me suggest strongly the Israeli attackers did not know they were aiming deadly fire at a vessel belonging to the United States. The intercepted communications between the air controller at Hatzor and helicopters dispatched in the wake of the attack show a progressive reversal of perception on their part."
3. JFK is under discussion right
now, so you can't bring him as another example of Israeli false-flag operations.
4. It's widely known that Al-Qaeda and Saudi Arabia were the main players there. Giving it as an example of an Israeli operation is strange, at the least, even if you
think it was one.
5.
Food taxTerrorism, attack, murder, terrorism,
food tax? That's just desperate...
Quote:
Attacks on the labeling of food with the symbols for kashruth (traditional Jewish dietary laws) have been a standard ploy of anti-Jewish bigots in the U.S. for decades. Such symbols as the "" emblem of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (UOJC), among others, confirm that products are kosher—i.e., that foods and production processes have been inspected by competent rabbis from the respective organizations and found to be in compliance with Jewish dietary law.
The cost to the consumer for this service is a miniscule fraction of the total production overhead; it is so negligible in practical terms as to be virtually non-existent. A May 18, 1975 New York Times article reported that the cost to General Foods' "Bird's Eye" Unit, for example, is 6.5 millionths (.0000065) of a cent per item. Furthermore, a representative of the Heinz Company has said that the per item cost is "so small we can't even calculate it," and that such labeling actually makes products less costly by increasing the market for them.
To sum it up, this is another list of allegedly Jewish crimes, collected with the obvious purpose of casting a shadow on Israel.
The Duke wrote:Quote:
Even if you have a solid case, you shouldn’t milk it too much or too enthusiastically.
I think that's the reason why the possible Israeli involvement hasn't become mainstream.
I actually agree that it could be the reason for lack of official statement. However, Capitalists are notorious leakers. I can't imagine such juicy information being kept a secret for so long.