Brutus wrote:More like they didn't do so much (not their fault for not being as awesome as us).
Wrong, I think around 90% of the bullets fired for the allies side were from France . . . if not 90 then at least the majority.
Americans barely fought.
Ibid. wrote:And you completely ignored my great joke.
No, I stressing the battle and war difference, that is someone can win a battle but lose a war . . . like Nazis.
NetsNJFan87 wrote:France didn't win, The UK, USSR and USA won and threw France a bone and let them sit at the big-boys table as a full-fledged ally at the end of the war.
Again, France was the largest force in taking down the Nazis.
Ever look at the data that says that the US had the lowest casualties. It is not because Americans can dodge bullets, though we can, but because we barely fought.
Ibid. wrote:Seriously France held out for about 45 days.
Stupid statement. France could have taken down Hitler from the get go, BUT England's appeasement prevented France from doing so. By the time that Hitler attacked France, Germany was already in France [the Rhineland.]
France did not fight, because England fucked up, not because it was weak.
It'd be like the police allowing a male man slayer to dorm in your adjacent room; when the bloke attacks, are you going to fight him or say "fuck the police" and live with him.
I would fight the bloke if he were outside of my house, but I lost the advantage when he is not.