Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

"It's the economy, stupid!"

Moderator: PoFo Economics & Capitalism Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
By Russkie
#1529738
can someone tell me which is a more accurate measurement of economic power for a country?

I never understand the nominal GDP, for Russia the nominal GDP of 2007 is 1.2$ trillion, while its GDP PPP is 2.0$+ trillion.

Isn't the nominal GDP based on the value of the USD currency exchange rate?

If so, this is not accurate for countries that have under or overvalued currency. Some economists speculate that the Russian ruble is actually undervalued, to keep foreign imports high.
User avatar
By Noelnada
#1529740
purchasing power parity (PPP)


Russia Rank 52 : 14,692 $


:lol: :lol: :lol:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... y_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

Well i don't know exactly how this is calculated

1
World $ 65,820,000,000,000 2007 est.
2
European Union $ 14,450,000,000,000 2007 est.
3
United States $ 13,860,000,000,000 2007 est.
4
China $ 7,043,000,000,000 2007 est.
5
Japan $ 4,417,000,000,000 2007 est.
6
India $ 2,965,000,000,000 2007 est.
7
Germany $ 2,833,000,000,000 2007 est.
8
United Kingdom $ 2,147,000,000,000 2007 est.
9
Russia $ 2,076,000,000,000 2007 est.
10
France $ 2,067,000,000,000 2007 est.

CIA
User avatar
By Nets
#1529790
Depends. Probably PPP, but that really only refers to the economic power of the country relative to its own prices, how much of its own goods at its price level can the country buy, etc. Nominal is probably more important when speaking globally.

I view Russia's economy as basically the same size as California's.
User avatar
By NYYS
#1529808
I tend to prefer PPP, as it gives a better idea of how well the system is working in that country.
By Russkie
#1529820
I view Russia's economy as basically the same size as California's.

Is that a good thing? California is large and powerful enough to be its own country.
User avatar
By stalker
#1529845
Nominal GDP is the sum of all goods and services produced in an economy in US $.

However, there are price differences between countries. In Russia, the average good / service is roughly twice cheaper than in the US, in $. Equalizing prices would give Russia's real PPP GDP. Nominal GDP divided by real GDP is the GDP deflator, i.e. the price differential.

Russia's (2.1tn $) PPP GDP is somewhat larger than California's (1.7tn $), but the scale is similar.

PPP GDP is a much better reflection of the material standard of living in a country, but nominal GDP is more useful as a measure of importance in the world economy.
By SeriousCat
#1533117
Nominal GDP is the sum of all goods and services produced in an economy in US $.

However, there are price differences between countries. In Russia, the average good / service is roughly twice cheaper than in the US, in $. Equalizing prices would give Russia's real PPP GDP. Nominal GDP divided by real GDP is the GDP deflator, i.e. the price differential.

Russia's (2.1tn $) PPP GDP is somewhat larger than California's (1.7tn $), but the scale is similar.

PPP GDP is a much better reflection of the material standard of living in a country, but nominal GDP is more useful as a measure of importance in the world economy.


To add to what's above, it's important to understand that PPP is purely theoretical, since there are anomalies such as international arbitrage and transport costs, etc. Also, for those that like a different take on PPP, check out the BMI (Big Mac Index) at Economist.com
User avatar
By yanovsky
#1533361
I will just add a piece of information: nominal GDP is used to measure the debt’s ratio because it takes into account the price fluctuation which affects the amount of money you have to pay off.
Personally the nominal GDP as it was said above is safer in international comparisons plus the calculation of PPP is very arcane and based more on theory than facts (it is only assumptions and as it was pointed out with California in America the standard of living aren’t the same wherever you are in a country).
By SeriousCat
#1533655
I will just add a piece of information: nominal GDP is used to measure the debt’s ratio because it takes into account the price fluctuation which affects the amount of money you have to pay off.
Personally the nominal GDP as it was said above is safer in international comparisons plus the calculation of PPP is very arcane and based more on theory than facts (it is only assumptions and as it was pointed out with California in America the standard of living aren’t the same wherever you are in a country).


However, nominal GDP is mostly irrelevant for comparing standards of living between countries. Each statistic has its unique uses.
User avatar
By NewEra
#1533713
PPP is preferable over nominal because nominal only gives the output of a country in terms of one currency (the USD). Countries like China will naturally provide misleading information regarding it's economic capabilities if nominal GDP is used for measurement; the currency is pegged to a basket of currencies as a managed float. PPP is a more accurate measurement because it equalizes exchange rates in terms of the real purchasing power of that country. However, PPP is without its own problems, mainly due to its idealistic attempt at ignoring different forms of managing exchange rates (free or peg, for example).
Servus!

The Longest Thread Ever is an informal thread and […]

First Post

The Longest Thread Ever is an informal thread and […]

Hi

The Longest Thread Ever is an informal thread and […]

Hello!

The Longest Thread Ever is an informal thread and […]