Should People Be Forced To Buy Things They Don't Want or Need? (revised version) - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

For discussion of moral and ethical issues.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#14984165
Forcing people to buy a product or service (assumedly under threat of force); is never justified.


Thus, people should not be forced to buy things they don't want or need, nor should they be forced to buy things they may or may-not need.
#14984167
Victoribus Spolia wrote:Forcing people to buy a product or service (assumedly under threat of force); is never justified.

Thus, people should not be forced to buy things they don't want or need, nor should they be forced to buy things they may or may-not need.


Really is it never justified? Playing devil's advocate I think I could make a case for it under emergency conditions such as war, famine and plague.
#14984172
SolarCross wrote:Really is it never justified? Playing devil's advocate I think I could make a case for it under emergency conditions such as war, famine and plague.


Why would it be justified to force me to buy grain during, lets say, a famine? Or why would it be justified to force me to take medicine during a plague? Of buy warbonds during a conflict?

Why can't I choose for myself to do that which could cause me harm?

Now, if what I was doing was definitely harming others, then that is not a question of forcing me purchase anything, at that point you are only preventing me from doing harm to others and is a seperate matter altogether.
#14984181
Victoribus Spolia wrote:Why would it be justified to force me to buy grain during, lets say, a famine? Or why would it be justified to force me to take medicine during a plague? Of buy warbonds during a conflict?

Why can't I choose for myself to do that which could cause me harm?

Now, if what I was doing was definitely harming others, then that is not a question of forcing me purchase anything, at that point you are only preventing me from doing harm to others and is a seperate matter altogether.


Dammit I was hoping you wouldn't call my bluff on that.

Okay, I'll try.. the examples you mention are relatively obvious things that you might well have sufficient understanding to do without coercion. However what if the circumstances demanded a purchase which is identified as needed by experts but must be performed by non-experts? For example one consequence of Magna Carta was that kings were extremely limited in legal means to raise funds for professional fighting men and this lead to the passing of numerous Archery Laws wherein as a substitute for gold for professionals regular folks were required to obtain and train with war bows so that they may be equiped and trained for times of war. The king here is the expert on matters of war and statecraft while the regular folks while being experts in many civilian matters generally know nothing much of strategic concerns and so wouldn't possess sufficient knowledge to make an informed choice in the matter and thus it was required to force them to purchase bows rather than persuade them to buy bows and let it slide if they chose not to.
#14984232
Pants-of-dog wrote:Do you think it is just that I am forced to pay for capitalism?


You are only forced to buy cops and courts in regards to "capitalism". I would say cops and courts probably could be excusable in that they are at least ostensibly set up to deal with emergency conditions, on the personal level theft, rape and murder are arguable emergency conditions. Likewise also for fire stations and emergency health care.

However it may be that fully volitional cops and courts are possible as described by David Freidman in his book Machinery of Freedom and in that case we should try that. It is worth a read at least.
#14984242
Pants-of-dog wrote:Are you arguing that I am living under emergency conditions, and that is why I am forced to pay for capitalism?

No, but cops and courts exist to deal with emergency conditions when they arise. War is an emergency condition but it helps to ready for war even while there is peace. The kings of old did not wait until there was a war to decree their Archery Laws because if they left it until then it would be too late to do any good.
Last edited by SolarCross on 29 Jan 2019 22:14, edited 1 time in total.
#14984244
Pants-of-dog wrote:I am forced to pay taxes that then go to pay the cops, judges, and lawmakers that provide the infrastructure for capitalism.

So, I am already being forced to do so.


Now I'm curious.

Would you pay for cops or judges under a socialist system? What if their behaviors under a socialist system largely the same as in a capitalist system? Stuff like breaingk up dirty capitalist protests with violence?
#14984245
Cops, politicians, and courts only deal with emergencies every now and then. A lot of time is spent on things like civil suits, or making laws supporting capitalism, and killing people trying to sell cigarettes.

Are all these other tasks for which I am forced to pay justified because some cops deal with emergencies every now and then?

Also, hospitals treating trauma patients are involved in emergency services. Does this justify a public health care system?

———————————

Rancid wrote:Now I'm curious.

Would you pay for cops or judges under a socialist system? What if their behaviors under a socialist system largely the same as in a capitalist system? Stuff like breaingk up dirty capitalist protests with violence?


In that case, it is something I want, need, and have asked for.
#14984248
Pants-of-dog wrote:Cops, politicians, and courts only deal with emergencies every now and then. A lot of time is spent on things like civil suits, or making laws supporting capitalism, and killing people trying to sell cigarettes.

Are all these other tasks for which I am forced to pay justified because some cops deal with emergencies every now and then?

It is certainly arguable that in a given polity there are too many cops or they perform poorly or whatever but I am dealing with principles here mainly. If you want to complain about your particular local cops shaking you down with speeding fines while letting axe murderers carry on without care then this isn't really the discussion for you.

Pants-of-dog wrote:Also, hospitals treating trauma patients are involved in emergency services. Does this justify a public health care system?

I already indicated that emergency health care could be justified this way.
#14984249
SolarCross wrote:It is certainly arguable that in a given polity there are too many cops or they perform poorly or whatever but I am dealing with principles here mainly. If you want to complain about your particular local cops shaking you down with speeding fines while letting axe murderers carry on without care then this isn't really the discussion for you.

I already indicated that emergency health care could be justified this way.


You did not understand my point.

Does the fact that some services are emergencies justify people paying for the whole system?

Some examples: https://twitter.com/OnlinePalEng/s[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

I do not have your life Godstud. I am never going[…]

He's a parasite

Trump Derangement Syndrome lives. :O