SSDR wrote:This is not a political statement.
Actually, it is.
Equality of opportunity is less important than extent of opportunity. Socialism achieves equality of opportunity by depriving everyone of opportunity equally.
You are opinionating about the false characteristics of a socialist economy.
No, I am identifying the logical consequences of socialism for an economy, consequences that have been observed in practice every single time socialism has been tried on a societal scale.
In a non socialist economy, inheritance is a privilege because not everyone can have inheritance in a non socialist economy.
No. That is merely an advantage, like being born more intelligent, beautiful or talented than others, not a privilege, because it doesn't take anything away from others. Privilege must deprive the underprivileged of what they would otherwise have. Inheritance per se doesn't do that any more than being born with exceptional beauty, talent or intelligence does.
Some people also get more than others (rich children versus children born in homelessness).
Merely getting more than others is just an advantage, not a privilege. Benefiting from deprivation of others is privilege.
That's because you're not in a Nazi country.
It's social norms and you don't realize that because you're a Nazi.
Name calling is not an argument. The science is very clear: it's genetic, not social.
Socialism is the most advanced form of economics.
No, it is absurd garbage -- even more absurd than capitalism -- that ignores the facts of economics.
In socialism, no woman's life is dependent on a man's.
It isn't in capitalism or most other systems, either.
You believing that women prior to the 20th century being smarter than now is very alarming and reactionary.
I didn't say they were smarter. Wiser, perhaps, because men did not insulate them from the reality of their biological nature.
Non socialist politics is demanding because of its money oriented atmosphere and due to higher rates of testosterone.
Isn't testosterone just social manipulation...?
This is not a political statement.
If you understand it, it is.
You're not engaging in a political discussion by calling someone "wrong."
Sure I am, especially when I explain how and why they are wrong.
Human trafficking is a type of slavery you Nazi.
Only if it involves labor compelled by force. Some human traffickers are paid by those they traffic to traffic them.
How do you feel about Nazism?
I find it incomprehensible that an educated and supposedly civilized people could have been seduced by such obvious absurdities. But then, a lot of educated and supposedly civilized people have been seduced by socialist absurdities, while others have actually sunk so low as to vote for Trump, or even to watch, "Keeping Up With the Kardashians."
This is not a political discussion. This is an aggressive statement.
What ideology do you need to motivate you to work?
Just some self-respect.
You believing that humans are chimpanzees or rats is not realistic.
You are again just makin' $#!+ up about what I plainly wrote.
This is a Nazi, human trafficking supporting viewpoint on what reality is.
You believing that humans are rats is not a political statement.
It's also something you made up. My point was that socialism makes them behave like rats.