- 30 May 2019 11:53
#15008505
No, you're not.
What you're *actually* doing is mixing-up socio-political contexts. Under the status quo you obviously want to *criminalize* any actions that threaten the prevailing power structure, for example the world's working class *seizing* the implements of automated / labor-leveraging mass industrial production, while you blithely *ignore* that it's *workers'* labor-power that makes anything run, or produces anything, including infrastructure and capital goods.
So all you're doing is referencing present-day *hegemonic* norms, and inappropriately imputing that onto the potential future implementation of *communist* relations, meaning full collectivization of social production by workers themselves / ourselves, and the ending of *private property* based social relations.
Also, for some historical context here:
Weather Underground (2002) [Documentary]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJjSz9oNqmA
And:
[2] G.U.T.S.U.C., Simplified
SolarCross wrote:
I am just cutting through the bullshit to what is the real essence of communism.
No, you're not.
What you're *actually* doing is mixing-up socio-political contexts. Under the status quo you obviously want to *criminalize* any actions that threaten the prevailing power structure, for example the world's working class *seizing* the implements of automated / labor-leveraging mass industrial production, while you blithely *ignore* that it's *workers'* labor-power that makes anything run, or produces anything, including infrastructure and capital goods.
So all you're doing is referencing present-day *hegemonic* norms, and inappropriately imputing that onto the potential future implementation of *communist* relations, meaning full collectivization of social production by workers themselves / ourselves, and the ending of *private property* based social relations.
Also, for some historical context here:
Weather Underground (2002) [Documentary]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJjSz9oNqmA
And:
[2] G.U.T.S.U.C., Simplified
Spoiler: show