Kolzene wrote:This has allowed our populations to soar to levels much higher than our areas could support in an agrarian fashion. Given energy consumption and production calculations, it has been estimated that North America could support up to approx. 130 million people in an agrarian lifestyle. Compared with today's population of well over 300 million
Agriculture is the only gauranteed means of un-employment, capitalists created the myth of scarcity to cover themselves as a class from their actual existance, which is a reaction to Feudalism, which is Agrarian, thus Capitalists arose through usage of trade which eventually reformed into usage of metal to protect the goods and eventually this led to the invention of technology, which was with the only initial (and in my opinion eternal and final) purpose of increasing luxury and wealth for the capitalists at the expense of the environment, masses, and sanctity of social relations and freedom from technological irritation (massive noise pollution, air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution, body pollution, and acid rain).
I think true progress is in the ideas of humanity which in themselves produce much more self-sufficiency for human material conditions, than material progress (technology). Such as in my opinion the only alternative to technocracy and technology is abolition of cities, towns, machines, industries, money, private property rights, and all other things related to technology and this would make working less exhaustive and repetitive as it is in currently with technology and its mother (Capitalism) and also this would make over-population into a thing of the past by making massive population increasing desireable because more population increase would mean more laborers and since labor would be collective and only physical the more laborers there are would mean the more labor is done and thus the more prosperity and abundance is produced and the labor required of the individual would decrease as population increases which is in the power of man, this only possible through National liberation (Nationalism), government of and by the people (Democracy), and liberation of Society from anti-social individuals (capitalists) and system (capitalism) (Socialism).
The reason why this is only possible with Nationalism, Democracy, and Socialism, is that all labor problems are related to problems of people of different nationalities not getting along, which Nationalism would solve by expelling all foreigners and descendants of foreigners that are not of the soil (which is evident just by looking at their physical appearance in that if it is evolved to be adapted to the particular environment of the Nation). And problems of people laboring without freedom of speech to explain their new ideas of improving labor to improve their own social conditions (such as the ideas of diffent forms of social set up to make labor much more comfortable and efficient at the same time), this would be solved through Democracy.
The problem of people laboring exhaustively just for survival through laboring for money instead of directly enjoying the products of their labor would be solved through Socialism, Socialism with agrarianism, because this way all products of labor would directly be useful (unlike in Capitalism where most products of labor are useless for survival, such as computers, television, video games, sun glasses, skin lotion, hair shampoo, books, clocks, and watches).
Agriculture encompasses and produces all the means for survival, Industry pollutes Agricultural means of production (the soil, the water, the air, and the animals). The essential things which all humans need are food, clothing, shelter, and medicines, all of which are provided from Agriculture without need of Industry.
Political forum vanguard.
- By grassroots1
- By Verv