- 18 Jun 2006 12:46
#894908
This is more based towards the totalitarian technocrats, as I reckon most of you are.
With the coming of automation and the like, it has been established that society of much time and of much abundance would be formed. Such seems very good for any society, but a problem is created. People will have free time to become educated. And with the education of more and more people, comes the inevitable problem of them running into inferior ideas and adopting them as their own. This leads to dissent.
Now an obvious solution would be censorship, but much easier when people have less time, for there is much more time not only to read, but to write and to plan.
So, I pose this question to you, how do you keep free time but keep the majority of people in a standstill of political and philosophical knowledge?
With the coming of automation and the like, it has been established that society of much time and of much abundance would be formed. Such seems very good for any society, but a problem is created. People will have free time to become educated. And with the education of more and more people, comes the inevitable problem of them running into inferior ideas and adopting them as their own. This leads to dissent.
Now an obvious solution would be censorship, but much easier when people have less time, for there is much more time not only to read, but to write and to plan.
So, I pose this question to you, how do you keep free time but keep the majority of people in a standstill of political and philosophical knowledge?