Anti-doping agency reveals damning report on Armstrong - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Sports, Hobbies and all things unrelated to Politics.

Moderator: PoFo The Lounge Mods

#14079408
Anti-doping agency says Armstrong sport's biggest cheat
By North America correspondent Jane Cowan, wires


Lance Armstrong was at the heart of the biggest doping conspiracy in sports history when he won the Tour de France seven years in a row, a US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) report says.

USADA has submitted its report on why it banned Armstrong for life to the International Cycling Union (UCI) and World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), releasing more than 1,000 pages of evidence from its probe of doping in cycling.

"Lance Armstrong did not merely use performance-enhancing drugs. He supplied them to his team-mates," the report said.

"He was not just a part of the doping culture on his team. He enforced and re-enforced it."

USADA describes its dossier as the most extensive, groundbreaking account of Armstrong's alleged doping ever revealed, bolstered by unprecedented interviews with 11 of his former team-mates.

Evidence against Armstrong - one of the world's most famous athletes who is well-known for his cancer-fighting charity work - also included financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results.



USADA says its report reveals conclusive and undeniable proof that brings to light for the first time a systemic, sustained and highly professionalised team-run doping conspiracy.

The report contained the sworn testimony of 26 people, including 15 professional riders.
Audio: Armstrong set to lose Tour titles (AM)

Armstrong denies ever engaging in doping and his legal team dismissed the report ahead of its release, saying there had been "no judge, no jury and no hearing" involved in reaching this judgment.

He has never failed a doping test but was banned for life by USADA in August after announcing he would not fight the charges.

The evidence shows beyond any doubt that the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team ran the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping program that sport has ever seen.


"The evidence shows beyond any doubt that the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team ran the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping program that sport has ever seen," USADA chief executive Travis Tygart said in a statement.

"The evidence also includes direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding."

Shortly after the report's release, two cyclists who provided testimony against Armstrong confessed to using performance-enhancing drugs.

George Hincapie, who rode alongside Armstrong when he won each of his seven Tour de France titles, admitted cheating and told USADA he was not alone.

"I would have been much more comfortable talking only about myself, but understood that I was obligated to tell the truth about everything I knew. So that is what I did," he said in a statement.

Another former Armstrong team-mate, Canada's Michael Barry, said he was pressured to dope by the team.

"After being encouraged by the team, pressured to perform and pushed to my physical limits, I crossed a line I promised myself and others I would not: I doped," he said.

Tygart has also spoken of the evidence of Armstrong trying to stop witnesses from cooperating with USADA's investigation.

"The evidence shows he has been in contact with a number of the witnesses trying to find out and actually discourage them from participating," Tygart told the BBC.

Armstrong's lawyers have repeatedly attacked the credibility of USADA's case, describing the proceedings as a "kangaroo court" and a "witch hunt" on the eve of the report's release.

"USADA has continued its efforts to coerce and manufacture evidence from other riders through threats and sweetheart deals and generated self-serving media coverage through leaks and piecemeal release of tired, disproven allegations," Armstrong's attorney, Timothy Herman, wrote in a letter to USADA.

"This reasoned decision will be a farce ... while USADA can put lipstick on a pig, it still remains a pig."

Several former team-mates had already spoken out publicly against Armstrong but USADA has named all 11 for the first time: Frankie Andreu, Barry, Tom Danielson, Tyler Hamilton, Hincapie, Floyd Landis, Levi Leipheimer, Stephen Swart, Christian Vande Velde, Jonathan Vaughters and David Zabriskie.

"It took tremendous courage for the riders on the USPS Team and others to come forward and speak truthfully. It is not easy to admit your mistakes and accept your punishment," USADA said.

"But that is what these riders have done for the good of the sport, and for the young riders who hope to one day reach their dreams without using dangerous drugs or methods."

The agency said that the evidence amassed in this investigation demonstrated that a "code of silence" regarding performance-enhancing drug use in cycling has been shattered, but more needs to be done.
Audio: Anderson concedes Armstrong evidence overwhelming (The World Today)

"From day one, we always hoped this investigation would bring to a close this troubling chapter in cycling's history and we hope the sport will use this tragedy to prevent it from ever happening again," it added.

The UCI has been heavily critical of USADA for not releasing its findings sooner.

The UCI can appeal the decision to ban Armstrong for life, even though Armstrong decided not to fight the case, but the governing body said it would not respond until it had studied the report.

"We have nothing yet," president Pat McQuaid said.

"We will put out a press release as soon as we receive the document."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-11/a ... ed/4306544

What a douche. I don't really give a toss about cycling, but I'm surprised by how much this makes me angry. This guy was such a role model and inspiration, and it turns out he was not just cheating himself, but was a ringleader in pushing doping on other cyclists. Anyone who wants to use the "oh everyone was doing it" defense should heed the comments contained in the reports that said "He was not just a part of the doping culture on his team. He enforced and re-enforced it."
#14079413
"the greatest cyclist" is no more,.. for shure.
There always will be fans that unconditionally trust in Armstrong and his denial. His denial is nothing more than keeping up his PR to sustain his present easy way of living. Yesterday George Hincapie (the master servant of Armstrongs team / finished the tour the France 17 times) publicly confessed everything on his personal website about those days.

So the jig really is is up in my book.
He is nothing but the biggest liar and a cheat among liars and cheaters
#14079692
How could something as major as this have been covered up by his team members for tens of years?
The same can be said about Jimmy Savile's child sex abuse scandal under the leadership of the BBC?

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely!

Still waiting for "information" on 911 terror attacks masterminded & executed with military precision from inside a cave in Afghanistan....
#14081329
I am not terribly surprised.

The media is quick to make darlings of people who shoudn't be darling.

I was just surprised the film TED included an ode to Armstrong even after it was clear that he was a doper.

Jihsan wrote:How could something as major as this have been covered up by his team members for tens of years?
The same can be said about Jimmy Savile's child sex abuse scandal under the leadership of the BBC?

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely!

Still waiting for "information" on 911 terror attacks masterminded & executed with military precision from inside a cave in Afghanistan....


This could potentially derail the thread but I am very curious what you think caused 9/11 then.

Was it an inside job?
#14081375
I'll just exploit this thread and digress a bit to say that the obscene income many professional sportsmen receive for things like kicking a ball through a meadow while barely knowing how to read should be taxed at probably no less than 95%.


Actually, you cannot say this.

That would put me in the position of agreement...
#14082120
Just to put some perspective current known doping finishes in the top 10 places in TDF (1998-2012)

1998 4 of the top 10, (including 1,2)
1999 5 of top 10 (including 1,2)
2000 6 of the top 10 (including 1,2)
2001 4 of the top 10 (including 1,2)
2002 6 of the top 10 (including 1)
2003 8 of the top 10 (including 1,2,3,4)
2004 5 of the top 10 (including 1)
2005 9 if the top 11 (including 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) (10-11th tied)
2006 2 of the top 10 (including 1)
2007 4 of the top 10 (including 1)
2008 5 of the top 10 (highest doper 3rd)
2009 4 of the top 10 (including 1)
2010 1 of the top 10 (including 1)
2011 2 of the top 10 (highest doper 3rd)
2012 "clean" so far

And only 3 winners (all single year winners) in since 1995 (after Indurain)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doping_at_ ... _de_France


Dont change my opinion of Armstrong always disliked him (hell I'm Australian and I dont like Cadel) Armstrong is a great cyclists and done a lot of good work for cancer. The Whole professional cycling world has a long dark history with doping. I love the TDF but I'm realistic about what has been going on.
#14085472
Who gives a flying fuck. He was a great athlete and did what he had to do. Doping culture should be enforced in US teams because we get crushed by China and Russia now. When it comes to cycling, the doping in that sport is heavy though, using EPO is terrible. It's much worse for your health than anything a weightlifter would take.
#14087547
Anyone who wants to use the "oh everyone was doing it" defense should heed the comments contained in the reports that said "He was not just a part of the doping culture on his team. He enforced and re-enforced it."


ON HIS TEAM. But outside his team he was enforcing nothing, yet still all his opponents doped. He wasn't part of the Festina team, the USPS team wasn't the only one informed in Puerto, he was't Ferrari's only client. He didn't make Ullrich dope, he didn't make Vinokourov dope, or Basso, or Zulle, or Pantani or Riis,. After he had left the sport he didn't have any power of Contador. Armstrong's team was not the only one doping but there seems to be this attempt to blame all the doping on him. Everyone else was doing it and outside of that team it had fuck all to do with what Lance was sticking in his veins. The sport was dirty.

Cycling would be just as doped up with or without Armstrong, it was taking drugs before him and many continue to take drugs after. It's worth noting that out of Puerto we learned that the doping doctors also have client in other sports. In fact if you ask the doctor at the centre of that scandal he will tell you there may be a reason for Spain doing so well in so many sports at the same time, he had them as clients. Armstrong was a product of the generation, he just took it further than anyone else could, he was probably the zenith of doping in cycling and maybe all of sport but without him it still would have went on.

But this has much further implications. Lance Armstrong is now facing jail. He denied doping under oath in court and so is now open to a charge of perjury. Not only that but his USPS team was funded with federal money and using that money to purchase drugs is federal offence. I think very soon we may see him before a judge.
#14090507
I glad this neocon dog has been stripped of his medals but am saddened by the UCI's decision not to reward the Tour de France titles to the second-place contestants. The courts should just seize his wealth and donate the proceeds towards anti-doping technologies.
Last edited by Quantum on 25 Oct 2012 21:06, edited 1 time in total.

Are you aware that the only difference between yo[…]

@FiveofSwords If you think that science is mer[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

I'm just free flowing thought here: I'm trying t[…]

Left vs right, masculine vs feminine

…. the left puts on the gas pedal and the right […]