- 14 Nov 2013 05:00
#14329744
The world championship started on the 9th, but due to time constraints I wasn't able to post this thread until now. Thus I will post the first four games with youtube commentary by GM Daniel king. His commentary is short and concise yet easy for the layman (me) to understand. So over the next few weeks we will see if the prodigal Norwegian Magnus Carlsen can unseat the current champion, the chess guru, Viswanathan Anand.
Game 1
[youtube]jwVcHN_ZS2c[/youtube]
Not a lot of activity in this game but as it's the first match it is hardly surprising that both players played it safe. Just to give you some context here's what messir King wrote:
Game 2
[youtube]pisCM_7V_q0[/youtube]
Some potential for sharp variations but both players were very conservative so it was a quick draw. Anand is looking very competitive.
Game 3
[youtube]Skl59jivbiw[/youtube]
Starts out like game 1 though it ends up much more interesting then game 1, but again it ends in a draw. I view these early games as the opening skirmishes in the long war that is world championship match. Anand is looking very strong and has consistently stymied Carlson's initiative.
Game 4
[youtube]Wh1RN3tqaK8[/youtube]
This game has been the best so far lot's of activity and Anand has really shown his power. The coordination Anand achieves at the 6:23 mark is masterful. Really this game proves that Anand is still a contender which I was unsure of leading up to the world championship. Obviously I stand corrected after this match. However Carlsen showed his chops by fighting back in the Endgame, still in the end another draw.
I'll be busy this weekend (no games til friday as thursday is a rest day) but by monday I should post Mr. King's analysis of the weekend's games.
Game 1
[youtube]jwVcHN_ZS2c[/youtube]
Not a lot of activity in this game but as it's the first match it is hardly surprising that both players played it safe. Just to give you some context here's what messir King wrote:
With regard to the 'boring' first game - this is rather typical for world championship matches, and we have to manage our expectations. These matches often produce many draws. The only important thing for the players is to have their nose in front of the other when they get to the finishing tape. In London 2000 Kramnik convincingly defeated Kasparov by winning just 2 games out of 15 (the rest were drawn). In tournament chess there are lots of other players and to win the event one must keep winning games. Not so here. Today was just a prelude. Both players gained a little information on the other and now they go back home and work with that. We have to see the match as a whole, not just focusing on individual games. I seem to remember posting something very similar at the previous world championship match...
Game 2
[youtube]pisCM_7V_q0[/youtube]
Some potential for sharp variations but both players were very conservative so it was a quick draw. Anand is looking very competitive.
Game 3
[youtube]Skl59jivbiw[/youtube]
Starts out like game 1 though it ends up much more interesting then game 1, but again it ends in a draw. I view these early games as the opening skirmishes in the long war that is world championship match. Anand is looking very strong and has consistently stymied Carlson's initiative.
Game 4
[youtube]Wh1RN3tqaK8[/youtube]
This game has been the best so far lot's of activity and Anand has really shown his power. The coordination Anand achieves at the 6:23 mark is masterful. Really this game proves that Anand is still a contender which I was unsure of leading up to the world championship. Obviously I stand corrected after this match. However Carlsen showed his chops by fighting back in the Endgame, still in the end another draw.
I'll be busy this weekend (no games til friday as thursday is a rest day) but by monday I should post Mr. King's analysis of the weekend's games.
They cannot look out far. They cannot look out deep. But when was that ever a bar to any watch they keep? -Robert Frost
Apathy: It's the name of the game
Apathy: It's the name of the game