- 07 Aug 2019 01:20
#15024033
You don't need to leap to his defense on this. He's proven that he's a poor businessman, something he takes pride in being known for. Try comparing him to other billionaires and you'll discover that he's pretty shitty.
BigSteve wrote:You're completely missing the point.No, I think you're defending him because you feel you have to. $400k to a man who has even "$3 billion", is a drop in a bucket. He'd be donating more than that every year simply for tax purposes, and you know that. That'd be like me getting paid $1000 to do a job, and instead giving the money to charity. It's insignificant as a wage, since the benefits out-weigh them.
BigSteve wrote:No, he's pretty fuckin' successful. It's ludicrous to state otherwise...He could have made as much money if he'd just thrown it in the bank. Yes, money is a standard for success in the business world, and since when is starting out with $400 million in 1971 and not being a great deal wealthier almost 50 years later, the sign of a good businessman?
You don't need to leap to his defense on this. He's proven that he's a poor businessman, something he takes pride in being known for. Try comparing him to other billionaires and you'll discover that he's pretty shitty.
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson