Pants-of-dog wrote:At least, that is why we have it in the Anglosphere.
That is not the reason given by the U.S. Constitution which denies such rights as enumerated in the Bill of Rights as having originated in the government.
So you are wrong.
Pants-of-dog wrote:Nazis may think they are contributing original ideas, but they are incorrect. If you can name an actual, original, true idea that Nazis and raxists ahve come up with in the last, let’s say, fifty years, please share.
Who gets to decide what is considered a new idea? Likewise, why should new ideas be the only criteria for being able to speak; does that mean that Christians should be prohibited the right of free speech because they maintain orthodoxy (contra new ideas); and don't necessarily hold ideas that would be a check on government?
As to your question; Far-Right thinkers have propagated the concept of white genocide and hypergamy in recent years, which does not exist in this same sense in far-right literature during the time you specified; likewise, the bell-curve arguments are new advancements in new far-right thought as compared to old far-right thought.
Indeed, the Alt. Right has also been called the "New Right" by modern commentators and some in the new right are national socialists. Thus showing that the Far-Right has been propagating new ideas into public discourse, for better of worse, and therefore under your argument would be entitled to free speech.
Furthermore, new ideas pertaining to historic-ism, especially along the lines of Evola and Spengler, are constantly being presented.
What "New" ideas has Marxism brought to the table in the last 50 years? And why should this fucking matter and who gets to decide? Me? You?
Pants-of-dog wrote:This is factually incorrect. Allende showed socialism was compatible with democracy and came up with new ideas about how to centralise and plan the economy in real time.
Allende was not around long enough for us to know how it would have turned out, he may have devolved into becoming a dictator for life with concentration camps, as that was the empirically established pattern of how communists tended to do things in the 20th century.
There materialist worldview is fraught with error and their propaganda machine suppressed a free press.
They do NOT make the government more accountable, as they often oppress their fellow citizens purely on the basis of class, and sometimes even on the basis of religion.