Sivad wrote:That's not even close to what it says. It says temperature has only risen 75% of what was expected.
Who's the illiterate now, smart guy?
Maybe you should follow your own advice.
I went on based on what you posted.
Why don't you go re-read your post.
Also, why don't you post a link or something, so that this can be potentially meaningfully discussed.
The only source of the analysis is you, and my post was accurate, based on your wording.
You might have posted a link, but quote the relevant sections, because believe you me, I won't be going and reading through shit and parsing sections.
If it's your source, you should be well able to quote the relevant passages.
My post was completely consistent with your wording. So you are the fool. At best, you misrepresented what you wanted to say.