- 08 Apr 2020 18:25
#15082781
No we do not !! You just completely fabricated that. Don't make shit up its not helping you. LOL .
They don't grow a lot of wheat, corn, or soybeans in California but then again you'd have understand the difference between a commodity and produce to realize that. LOL
BTW How are you going to get your California food (which is perishable BTW) to New York City ?
This statement is just the opposite.
You really are out of your depth here on this subject you seem not to have a good understanding of it.
late wrote:We import over half our food. Of the remaining half, roughly 13% comes from Cal, and another few percent from local farms.
So food would get a little more expensive, but imports would ramp up, as would Cal and local farms.
A lot of Red states already have a lot of food insecurity, this would just make that worse because it doesn't take a big loss of revenue to kill off a farm (damaging the state economy, reducing tax income and thus help for the poor).
No we do not !! You just completely fabricated that. Don't make shit up its not helping you. LOL .
They don't grow a lot of wheat, corn, or soybeans in California but then again you'd have understand the difference between a commodity and produce to realize that. LOL
BTW How are you going to get your California food (which is perishable BTW) to New York City ?
late wrote:A lot of Red states already have a lot of food insecurity, this would just make that worse because it doesn't take a big loss of revenue to kill off a farm (damaging the state economy, reducing tax income and thus help for the poor).
This statement is just the opposite.
You really are out of your depth here on this subject you seem not to have a good understanding of it.