Cartertonian wrote:
The World is too complex to attribute cause to single factors, but in my view a significant causal factor has been the internet itself.
In 'life-before-internet', if you wanted information you had to go to a library - or at least a bookshop - and the overwhelming majority of books you could read were written by people with some degree of expertise, knowledge and understanding of the subject and were predominantly well-researched and referenced back to definitive, seminal information sources.
These days, you can read and/or watch any number of opinionated talking heads pontificating about any topic, with no evidence of their expertise, knowledge and understanding, nor any of their opinions being well-researched. But if they are saying what people want to hear, many people will accept it at face value, without critique.
We seem to have an unconscious appetite for confirmation bias and a resistance to counter-evidence, that has grown exponentially along with the internet.
All very good points but I believe I have identified some critical factors in explaining this extreme tribalism.
1. Gratuitous emotionalism.
2. Lack of critical thinking skills.
3. And, yes, the comfort of confirmation bias and groupthink.
Cartertonian wrote:Thus polarity and binary thought are becoming more widespread. When you consider that in politics, both here and in the US, adversarialism is at the very core of the entire system, then an electorate that is in most cases unwittingly becoming more partisan will feed back into that political system and compound the polarity.
This binary thinking is a curiosity to me.
It is the sort of thing you might find in a debating team competition.
It is also something that would indicate a lack of intellectual capacity in some circumstances.
I avoid devil's advocacy. Some people don't understand the meaning of 'discussion'.
I hope people here prefer sharing ideas rather than being interested in point-scoring.
Tell me if I have come to the wrong place.
Cartertonian wrote:The World really isn't black and white, left and right or cleaved neatly into any other 50/50 division, but our political systems persist in presenting choices to their electorates as if it were. Add in the aforementioned, uncurated 'information explosion' and it's no wonder societies are becoming more divided and internal tensions increasing.
But what about personal responsibility?
It is a decision to behave and think as an emotionally deranged barbarian rather than a rational, objective individual.
Cartertonian wrote:And 'hate' itself is an essential component of tribal solidarity, so if you identify with one tribe and fear incursions from another, teaching/allowing yourself to 'hate' the other tribe is a regrettable but inevitable consequence borne of our primitive instincts
But, as I said, regressing to a tribalistic mindset is a decision, surely.
It isn't inevitable.