- 24 Jun 2021 23:31
#15178252
Or *is* it -- ?
The point is that it's *covertly* discriminatory, so that it can't be *proven* to be intentionally discriminatory, but it's obviously *functionally* discriminatory.
wat0n wrote:
Interesting fact I was not aware of. Yes, if that "Crosscheck list" is set up in a racially discriminatory way then it's clearly illegal.
Or *is* it -- ?
The point is that it's *covertly* discriminatory, so that it can't be *proven* to be intentionally discriminatory, but it's obviously *functionally* discriminatory.